Re: [PATCHv2 00/14] set_memory_* functions header refactor

2017-03-02 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:14:52PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > Hi, > > This is v2 of my proposal to move set_memory_* function prototypes out of > cacheflush.h and into their own header file. This came out of a comment > Russell made while reviewing RODATA test cases >

Re: [PATCHv2 00/14] set_memory_* functions header refactor

2017-03-02 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:14:52PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > Hi, > > This is v2 of my proposal to move set_memory_* function prototypes out of > cacheflush.h and into their own header file. This came out of a comment > Russell made while reviewing RODATA test cases >

[PATCHv2 00/14] set_memory_* functions header refactor

2017-03-01 Thread Laura Abbott
Hi, This is v2 of my proposal to move set_memory_* function prototypes out of cacheflush.h and into their own header file. This came out of a comment Russell made while reviewing RODATA test cases http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-January/480855.html While the final

[PATCHv2 00/14] set_memory_* functions header refactor

2017-03-01 Thread Laura Abbott
Hi, This is v2 of my proposal to move set_memory_* function prototypes out of cacheflush.h and into their own header file. This came out of a comment Russell made while reviewing RODATA test cases http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-January/480855.html While the final