Re: [PATCHv2 01/38] ARM: dts: motorola-cpcap-mapphone: Prepare for dtbs_check parsing

2021-03-23 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Sebastian Reichel [210323 12:52]: > Hi Tony, > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:29:19PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Sebastian Reichel [210317 13:50]: > > > '<&gpio1 parameters &gpio2 parameters>' and '<&gpio1 parameters>, > > > <&gpio2 parameters>' result in the same DTB, but second format h

Re: [PATCHv2 01/38] ARM: dts: motorola-cpcap-mapphone: Prepare for dtbs_check parsing

2021-03-23 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi Tony, On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:29:19PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Sebastian Reichel [210317 13:50]: > > '<&gpio1 parameters &gpio2 parameters>' and '<&gpio1 parameters>, > > <&gpio2 parameters>' result in the same DTB, but second format has > > better source code readability. Also 'dtbs

Re: [PATCHv2 01/38] ARM: dts: motorola-cpcap-mapphone: Prepare for dtbs_check parsing

2021-03-17 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Sebastian Reichel [210317 13:50]: > '<&gpio1 parameters &gpio2 parameters>' and '<&gpio1 parameters>, > <&gpio2 parameters>' result in the same DTB, but second format has > better source code readability. Also 'dtbs_check' currently uses > this format to determine the amount of items specified,

[PATCHv2 01/38] ARM: dts: motorola-cpcap-mapphone: Prepare for dtbs_check parsing

2021-03-17 Thread Sebastian Reichel
'<&gpio1 parameters &gpio2 parameters>' and '<&gpio1 parameters>, <&gpio2 parameters>' result in the same DTB, but second format has better source code readability. Also 'dtbs_check' currently uses this format to determine the amount of items specified, so using this syntax is needed to successfull