Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:21 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > >> > I don't see kbasename() anywhere. Is this based off of other patches? > >> It's introduced by first patch in

Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> > I don't see kbasename() anywhere. Is this based off of other patches? >> It's introduced by first patch in the series. > Usually a series has the format of: > > [PATCH x/n]

Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 13:12 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > -- Seve Error: SIGFAULT! -- Steve ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > I don't see kbasename() anywhere. Is this based off of other patches? > It's introduced by first patch in the series. > Usually a series has the format of: [PATCH x/n] Where x is the patch number and n is the total number of

Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 11:53 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko >> Cc: Steven Rostedt >> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker >> --- >> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |8 >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4

Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 11:53 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > Cc: Steven Rostedt > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker > --- > kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |8 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c

Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 11:53 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com Cc: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org Cc: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com --- kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4

Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote: On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 11:53 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com Cc: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org Cc: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com ---

Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: I don't see kbasename() anywhere. Is this based off of other patches? It's introduced by first patch in the series. Usually a series has the format of: [PATCH x/n] Where x is the patch number and n is the total number of

Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 13:12 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: -- Seve Error: SIGFAULT! -- Steve ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: I don't see kbasename() anywhere. Is this based off of other patches? It's introduced by first patch in the series. Usually a series has the format of: [PATCH

Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:21 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: I don't see kbasename() anywhere. Is this based off of other patches? It's introduced by first

[PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Frederic Weisbecker --- kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c index 03003cd..c7ba4f6 100644 ---

[PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

2012-10-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com Cc: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org Cc: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com --- kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c