* Will Deacon [2015-10-15 13:47:56 +0100]:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:12:41PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > * Will Deacon [2015-10-09 11:33:52 +0100]:
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:59:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> > > > MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:12:41PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Will Deacon [2015-10-09 11:33:52 +0100]:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:59:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> > > MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> > > This patch fixes this issue.
> >
On Thursday 15 October 2015 14:12:41 Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Will Deacon [2015-10-09 11:33:52 +0100]:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:59:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> > > MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> > > This patch fixes this issue.
> > >
>
* Will Deacon [2015-10-09 11:33:52 +0100]:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:59:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> > MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> > This patch fixes this issue.
> >
> > This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c).
> >
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:12:41PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Will Deacon [2015-10-09 11:33:52 +0100]:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:59:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> > > MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> > > This patch
* Will Deacon [2015-10-09 11:33:52 +0100]:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:59:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> > MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> > This patch fixes this issue.
> >
> > This issue is reported in LTP (testcase:
On Thursday 15 October 2015 14:12:41 Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Will Deacon [2015-10-09 11:33:52 +0100]:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:59:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> > > MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> > > This patch fixes
* Will Deacon [2015-10-15 13:47:56 +0100]:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:12:41PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > * Will Deacon [2015-10-09 11:33:52 +0100]:
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:59:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> > > > MINSIGSTKSZ and
>> MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
>> This patch fixes this issue.
>>
>> This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c).
>> Testcase failed when sigaltstack() called with stack size "MINSIGSTKSZ - 1"
>> Since in Glibc-2.22, MINSIGSTKSZ is set
On Friday 09 October 2015 11:33:52 Will Deacon wrote:
> Acked-by: Will Deacon
>
> Arnd: are you planning to take this via asm-generic, or shall I queue it
> on the arm64 fixes branch?
>
Please merge it for arm64 with my
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:59:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> This patch fixes this issue.
>
> This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c).
> Testcase failed when sigaltstack() called with stack size
MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
This patch fixes this issue.
This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c).
Testcase failed when sigaltstack() called with stack size "MINSIGSTKSZ - 1"
Since in Glibc-2.22, MINSIGSTKSZ is set to 5120 but in
MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
This patch fixes this issue.
This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c).
Testcase failed when sigaltstack() called with stack size "MINSIGSTKSZ - 1"
Since in Glibc-2.22, MINSIGSTKSZ is set to 5120 but in
On Friday 09 October 2015 11:33:52 Will Deacon wrote:
> Acked-by: Will Deacon
>
> Arnd: are you planning to take this via asm-generic, or shall I queue it
> on the arm64 fixes branch?
>
Please merge it for arm64 with my
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
>> MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
>> This patch fixes this issue.
>>
>> This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c).
>> Testcase failed when sigaltstack() called with stack size "MINSIGSTKSZ - 1"
>> Since in Glibc-2.22, MINSIGSTKSZ is set
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:59:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> This patch fixes this issue.
>
> This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c).
> Testcase failed when sigaltstack() called with stack size
16 matches
Mail list logo