On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:06:39PM -0400, Raphaël Beamonte wrote:
> 2015-08-18 5:15 GMT-04:00 Dan Carpenter :
> > To be honest, I have lost track of this patchset. If you are planning
> > to redo the other patches can you send it in a new thread?
>
> Actually, Greg already included the "return
2015-08-18 5:15 GMT-04:00 Dan Carpenter :
> To be honest, I have lost track of this patchset. If you are planning
> to redo the other patches can you send it in a new thread?
Actually, Greg already included the "return statement" and
"DECLARE_WILC_BUFFER" ones.
The replacement of printk by
To be honest, I have lost track of this patchset. If you are planning
to redo the other patches can you send it in a new thread?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo
2015-08-18 5:15 GMT-04:00 Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com:
To be honest, I have lost track of this patchset. If you are planning
to redo the other patches can you send it in a new thread?
Actually, Greg already included the return statement and
DECLARE_WILC_BUFFER ones.
The replacement
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:06:39PM -0400, Raphaël Beamonte wrote:
2015-08-18 5:15 GMT-04:00 Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com:
To be honest, I have lost track of this patchset. If you are planning
to redo the other patches can you send it in a new thread?
Actually, Greg already
To be honest, I have lost track of this patchset. If you are planning
to redo the other patches can you send it in a new thread?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:12:47PM -0400, Raphaël Beamonte wrote:
> The MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER() macro was using a return statement, and didn't
> take care of possible memory leaks and subsequent bugs when it was failing
> after succeeding some allocations. This patch corrects this behavior.
>
>
The MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER() macro was using a return statement, and didn't
take care of possible memory leaks and subsequent bugs when it was failing
after succeeding some allocations. This patch corrects this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Beamonte
---
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:12:47PM -0400, Raphaël Beamonte wrote:
The MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER() macro was using a return statement, and didn't
take care of possible memory leaks and subsequent bugs when it was failing
after succeeding some allocations. This patch corrects this behavior.
The MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER() macro was using a return statement, and didn't
take care of possible memory leaks and subsequent bugs when it was failing
after succeeding some allocations. This patch corrects this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
