On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> >> On Mon, Jan
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E.
Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> > Quoting
Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> >> On Mon,
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E.
Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> > Quoting
Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> > Quoting James Morris
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
>> >> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018,
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
>> >> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> >> I meant
Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
> >> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> I meant in terms of "marking" a user ns as
Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
> >> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> I meant in terms of "marking" a user ns as "controlled" type -- it's
>
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
>> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>
>> > > Also, why do we need the concept of a controlled user-ns at all, if the
>> > > default whitelist maintains existing
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
>> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>
>> > > Also, why do we need the concept of a controlled user-ns at all, if the
>> > > default whitelist maintains existing behavior?
>> >
>>
Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> > > Also, why do we need the concept of a controlled user-ns at all, if the
> > > default whitelist maintains existing behavior?
> >
> > In past discussions two uses have been brought up:
> >
> >
Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> > > Also, why do we need the concept of a controlled user-ns at all, if the
> > > default whitelist maintains existing behavior?
> >
> > In past discussions two uses have been brought up:
> >
> >
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 11:35:26AM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:31 AM, James Morris
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 11:35:26AM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:31 AM, James Morris
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello James,
> > >>
> > >> Seems
Hello Michael,
I really don't want to turn this into how-to-hack guide but I do see
few points in your argument to make the case clearer. Please see the
comments inline.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hello Mahesh,
>
> On
Hello Michael,
I really don't want to turn this into how-to-hack guide but I do see
few points in your argument to make the case clearer. Please see the
comments inline.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hello Mahesh,
>
> On 12/28/2017 01:45 AM, Mahesh
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:31 AM, James Morris
wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
>
>> Hello James,
>>
>> Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
>> patch series. Would you be willing be pull this into the
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:31 AM, James Morris
wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
>
>> Hello James,
>>
>> Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
>> patch series. Would you be willing be pull this into the security
>> tree? Serge Hallyn
Hello Mahesh,
On 12/28/2017 01:45 AM, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> wrote:
>> Hello Mahesh,
>>
>> On 27 December 2017 at 18:09, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
>> wrote:
>>>
Hello Mahesh,
On 12/28/2017 01:45 AM, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> wrote:
>> Hello Mahesh,
>>
>> On 27 December 2017 at 18:09, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
>> wrote:
>>> Hello James,
>>>
>>> Seems like I missed your
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hello Mahesh,
>
> On 27 December 2017 at 18:09, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
> wrote:
>> Hello James,
>>
>> Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
>>
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hello Mahesh,
>
> On 27 December 2017 at 18:09, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
> wrote:
>> Hello James,
>>
>> Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
>> patch series. Would you be willing be pull
Hello Mahesh,
On 27 December 2017 at 18:09, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
> patch series. Would you be willing be pull this into the security
> tree? Serge Hallyn has already ACKed
Hello Mahesh,
On 27 December 2017 at 18:09, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
> patch series. Would you be willing be pull this into the security
> tree? Serge Hallyn has already ACKed it.
We seem to have
Hello James,
Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
patch series. Would you be willing be pull this into the security
tree? Serge Hallyn has already ACKed it.
Thanks,
--mahesh..
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> From:
Hello James,
Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
patch series. Would you be willing be pull this into the security
tree? Serge Hallyn has already ACKed it.
Thanks,
--mahesh..
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> From: Mahesh Bandewar
>
> TL;DR
From: Mahesh Bandewar
TL;DR version
-
Creating a sandbox environment with namespaces is challenging
considering what these sandboxed processes can engage into. e.g.
CVE-2017-6074, CVE-2017-7184, CVE-2017-7308 etc. just to name few.
Current form of user-namespaces,
From: Mahesh Bandewar
TL;DR version
-
Creating a sandbox environment with namespaces is challenging
considering what these sandboxed processes can engage into. e.g.
CVE-2017-6074, CVE-2017-7184, CVE-2017-7308 etc. just to name few.
Current form of user-namespaces, however, if changed
32 matches
Mail list logo