On Saturday 16 February 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > @@ -1836,6 +1825,12 @@ static int dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > dma_async_device_register(>dma);
> >
> > + if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> > + err = of_dma_controller_register(pdev->dev.of_node,
> > +
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The original device tree binding for this driver, from Viresh Kumar
> unfortunately conflicted with the generic DMA binding, and did not allow
> to completely seperate slave device configuration from the controller.
>
> This is an attempt
The original device tree binding for this driver, from Viresh Kumar
unfortunately conflicted with the generic DMA binding, and did not allow
to completely seperate slave device configuration from the controller.
This is an attempt to replace it with an implementation of the generic
binding, but
The original device tree binding for this driver, from Viresh Kumar
unfortunately conflicted with the generic DMA binding, and did not allow
to completely seperate slave device configuration from the controller.
This is an attempt to replace it with an implementation of the generic
binding, but
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
The original device tree binding for this driver, from Viresh Kumar
unfortunately conflicted with the generic DMA binding, and did not allow
to completely seperate slave device configuration from the controller.
This is an
On Saturday 16 February 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
@@ -1836,6 +1825,12 @@ static int dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dma_async_device_register(dw-dma);
+ if (pdev-dev.of_node)
+ err = of_dma_controller_register(pdev-dev.of_node,
+
6 matches
Mail list logo
