On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 20:50 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Thanks, I hope that Jim's ack still applies to this version.
Yes. v4 looks fine, although Oleg has a good point about moving the
comment. But I'd move more of the comment, starting with
* We have to fix things up as follows:
Thanks, I hope that Jim's ack still applies to this version.
On 05/01, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> v4: Changed arch_uprobe_xol_was_trapped() comment to reflect new logic.
Hmm. I guess you meant arch_uprobe_post_xol()... please see below.
> static int default_post_xol_op(struct arch_uprobe
It is possible to replace rip-relative addressing mode
with addressing mode of the same length: (reg+disp32).
This eliminates the need to fix up immediate
and correct for changing instruction length.
v2: Rebased on top of Oleg's latest changes and run-tested.
v3: Removed unnecessary cast.
It is possible to replace rip-relative addressing mode
with addressing mode of the same length: (reg+disp32).
This eliminates the need to fix up immediate
and correct for changing instruction length.
v2: Rebased on top of Oleg's latest changes and run-tested.
v3: Removed unnecessary cast.
Thanks, I hope that Jim's ack still applies to this version.
On 05/01, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
v4: Changed arch_uprobe_xol_was_trapped() comment to reflect new logic.
Hmm. I guess you meant arch_uprobe_post_xol()... please see below.
static int default_post_xol_op(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 20:50 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Thanks, I hope that Jim's ack still applies to this version.
Yes. v4 looks fine, although Oleg has a good point about moving the
comment. But I'd move more of the comment, starting with
* We have to fix things up as follows:
6 matches
Mail list logo
