On 01/29/2013 04:51 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:40:22 -0600
> Seth Jennings wrote:
>
>> This patch promotes the slab-based zsmalloc memory allocator
>> from the staging tree to lib/
>
> Hate to rain on the parade, but... we haven't reviewed zsmalloc
> yet. At least, I
On 01/29/2013 04:51 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:40:22 -0600
Seth Jennings sjenn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This patch promotes the slab-based zsmalloc memory allocator
from the staging tree to lib/
Hate to rain on the parade, but... we haven't reviewed zsmalloc
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:28:41AM -0600, Seth Jennings wrote:
> On 01/29/2013 04:51 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:40:22 -0600
> > Seth Jennings wrote:
> >
> >> This patch promotes the slab-based zsmalloc memory allocator
> >> from the staging tree to lib/
> >
> > Hate to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:28:41 -0600
Seth Jennings wrote:
> Question, are you saying that you'd like to see the zsmalloc promotion
> in a separate patch?
>
> My reason for including the zsmalloc promotion inside the zswap
> patches was that it promoted and introduced a user all together.
>
On 01/29/2013 04:51 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:40:22 -0600
> Seth Jennings wrote:
>
>> This patch promotes the slab-based zsmalloc memory allocator
>> from the staging tree to lib/
>
> Hate to rain on the parade, but... we haven't reviewed zsmalloc
> yet. At least, I
On 01/29/2013 04:51 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:40:22 -0600
Seth Jennings sjenn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This patch promotes the slab-based zsmalloc memory allocator
from the staging tree to lib/
Hate to rain on the parade, but... we haven't reviewed zsmalloc
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:28:41 -0600
Seth Jennings sjenn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Question, are you saying that you'd like to see the zsmalloc promotion
in a separate patch?
My reason for including the zsmalloc promotion inside the zswap
patches was that it promoted and introduced a user
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:28:41AM -0600, Seth Jennings wrote:
On 01/29/2013 04:51 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:40:22 -0600
Seth Jennings sjenn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This patch promotes the slab-based zsmalloc memory allocator
from the staging tree to lib/
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:40:22 -0600
Seth Jennings wrote:
> This patch promotes the slab-based zsmalloc memory allocator
> from the staging tree to lib/
Hate to rain on the parade, but... we haven't reviewed zsmalloc
yet. At least, I haven't, and I haven't seen others do so.
So how's about we
This patch promotes the slab-based zsmalloc memory allocator
from the staging tree to lib/
zswap depends on this allocator for storing compressed RAM pages
in an efficient way under system wide memory pressure where
high-order (greater than 0) page allocation are very likely to
fail.
For more
This patch promotes the slab-based zsmalloc memory allocator
from the staging tree to lib/
zswap depends on this allocator for storing compressed RAM pages
in an efficient way under system wide memory pressure where
high-order (greater than 0) page allocation are very likely to
fail.
For more
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:40:22 -0600
Seth Jennings sjenn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This patch promotes the slab-based zsmalloc memory allocator
from the staging tree to lib/
Hate to rain on the parade, but... we haven't reviewed zsmalloc
yet. At least, I haven't, and I haven't seen others
12 matches
Mail list logo