Hi Rob,
On 05/02/2014 09:58 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>> This patch adds the generic common bindings used to represent
>> a hwlock device and use/request locks in a device-tree build.
>>
>> All the platform-specific hwlock driver implementations
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> This patch adds the generic common bindings used to represent
> a hwlock device and use/request locks in a device-tree build.
>
> All the platform-specific hwlock driver implementations need the
> number of locks and associated base id for
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
This patch adds the generic common bindings used to represent
a hwlock device and use/request locks in a device-tree build.
All the platform-specific hwlock driver implementations need the
number of locks and associated base id
Hi Rob,
On 05/02/2014 09:58 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
This patch adds the generic common bindings used to represent
a hwlock device and use/request locks in a device-tree build.
All the platform-specific hwlock driver
This patch adds the generic common bindings used to represent
a hwlock device and use/request locks in a device-tree build.
All the platform-specific hwlock driver implementations need the
number of locks and associated base id for registering the locks
present within the device with the driver
This patch adds the generic common bindings used to represent
a hwlock device and use/request locks in a device-tree build.
All the platform-specific hwlock driver implementations need the
number of locks and associated base id for registering the locks
present within the device with the driver
6 matches
Mail list logo