Re: [PULL REQUEST] remove .owner for most platform_drivers

2014-11-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:54:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > @all: The granularity level is per-directory. Greg was okay with that, speak > up > if you strongly disagree. I am really going for consistency here, not patch > count (and to avoid patches on per-driver level which I already got a

Re: [PULL REQUEST] remove .owner for most platform_drivers

2014-11-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:54:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: @all: The granularity level is per-directory. Greg was okay with that, speak up if you strongly disagree. I am really going for consistency here, not patch count (and to avoid patches on per-driver level which I already got a few

Re: [PULL REQUEST] remove .owner for most platform_drivers

2014-11-03 Thread Wolfram Sang
> Just to be sure, the 4 other patches you sent also need to go in here > for 3.19, right? They were not included in this pull request? Yes, they are bugfixes and should go into v3.19 IMO. I sent them as seperate patches so people could review them (which was not necessary for the patches in the

Re: [PULL REQUEST] remove .owner for most platform_drivers

2014-11-03 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:54:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Greg, > > as discussed at ELCE, here is my pull request for cleaning up all unneeded > assignment of .owner for platform drivers. I used the following semantic patch > to check that it only removes it when .owner gets initialized

Re: [PULL REQUEST] remove .owner for most platform_drivers

2014-11-03 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:54:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: Hi Greg, as discussed at ELCE, here is my pull request for cleaning up all unneeded assignment of .owner for platform drivers. I used the following semantic patch to check that it only removes it when .owner gets initialized by

Re: [PULL REQUEST] remove .owner for most platform_drivers

2014-11-03 Thread Wolfram Sang
Just to be sure, the 4 other patches you sent also need to go in here for 3.19, right? They were not included in this pull request? Yes, they are bugfixes and should go into v3.19 IMO. I sent them as seperate patches so people could review them (which was not necessary for the patches in the

[PULL REQUEST] remove .owner for most platform_drivers

2014-10-21 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi Greg, as discussed at ELCE, here is my pull request for cleaning up all unneeded assignment of .owner for platform drivers. I used the following semantic patch to check that it only removes it when .owner gets initialized by the call to register the driver: --- @match1@ declarer name

[PULL REQUEST] remove .owner for most platform_drivers

2014-10-21 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi Greg, as discussed at ELCE, here is my pull request for cleaning up all unneeded assignment of .owner for platform drivers. I used the following semantic patch to check that it only removes it when .owner gets initialized by the call to register the driver: --- @match1@ declarer name