Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incrementalfsck)

2008-01-19 Thread Pavel Machek
On Fri 2008-01-18 10:16:30, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Theodore Tso wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:31:48PM -0800, Bryan Henderson wrote: > >> But I heard some years ago from a disk drive engineer that that is a myth > >> just like the rotational energy

Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incrementalfsck)

2008-01-19 Thread Pavel Machek
On Fri 2008-01-18 10:16:30, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Theodore Tso wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:31:48PM -0800, Bryan Henderson wrote: But I heard some years ago from a disk drive engineer that that is a myth just like the rotational energy thing. I added

Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incrementalfsck)

2008-01-18 Thread linux-os (Dick Johnson)
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:31:48PM -0800, Bryan Henderson wrote: >> But I heard some years ago from a disk drive engineer that that is a myth >> just like the rotational energy thing. I added that to the discussion, >> but admitted that I haven't

Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incrementalfsck)

2008-01-18 Thread linux-os (Dick Johnson)
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Theodore Tso wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:31:48PM -0800, Bryan Henderson wrote: But I heard some years ago from a disk drive engineer that that is a myth just like the rotational energy thing. I added that to the discussion, but admitted that I haven't actually