On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 01:53:12PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Fine. I will resubmit this patchset then once we are into 2.6.25
> > cycle.
>
> no need (unless you have bugfixes) i'm carrying this around in the
> scheduler git tree. (it will show up in sched-devel.git)
Cool .. Thx! It will
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 12:09:10PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > thanks, it looks good - but the fact that we are at v4 of the patchset
> > underlines the point that this is more of a v2.6.25 patchset than a
> > v2.6.24 one.
>
> Fine. I will
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 12:09:10PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> thanks, it looks good - but the fact that we are at v4 of the patchset
> underlines the point that this is more of a v2.6.25 patchset than a
> v2.6.24 one.
Fine. I will resubmit this patchset then once we are into 2.6.25 cycle.
>
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:28:36PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > the first SCHED_RR priority is 1, not 0 - so this call will always fail.
>
> Thanks for spotting this bug and rest of your review comments.
>
> Here's V4 of the patchset, aimed at
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:28:36PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
the first SCHED_RR priority is 1, not 0 - so this call will always fail.
Thanks for spotting this bug and rest of your review comments.
Here's V4 of the patchset, aimed at
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 12:09:10PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
thanks, it looks good - but the fact that we are at v4 of the patchset
underlines the point that this is more of a v2.6.25 patchset than a
v2.6.24 one.
Fine. I will resubmit this patchset then once we are into 2.6.25 cycle.
Group
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 12:09:10PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
thanks, it looks good - but the fact that we are at v4 of the patchset
underlines the point that this is more of a v2.6.25 patchset than a
v2.6.24 one.
Fine. I will resubmit
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 01:53:12PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Fine. I will resubmit this patchset then once we are into 2.6.25
cycle.
no need (unless you have bugfixes) i'm carrying this around in the
scheduler git tree. (it will show up in sched-devel.git)
Cool .. Thx! It will get me
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:28:36PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> the first SCHED_RR priority is 1, not 0 - so this call will always fail.
Thanks for spotting this bug and rest of your review comments.
Here's V4 of the patchset, aimed at improving fairness of cpu bandwidth
allocation for task
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:28:36PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
the first SCHED_RR priority is 1, not 0 - so this call will always fail.
Thanks for spotting this bug and rest of your review comments.
Here's V4 of the patchset, aimed at improving fairness of cpu bandwidth
allocation for task
10 matches
Mail list logo