Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On 2015/10/9 17:08, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote: > On 2015/10/09 14:52, Jiang Liu wrote: >> On 2015/10/9 4:20, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes >>> wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: > Acked-by: Kiran Patil

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On 2015/10/09 14:52, Jiang Liu wrote: On 2015/10/9 4:20, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: Acked-by: Kiran Patil Where's the call to preempt_disable() to prevent kernels with preemption from

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On 2015/10/09 14:52, Jiang Liu wrote: On 2015/10/9 4:20, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: Acked-by: Kiran Patil Where's the call to preempt_disable()

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On 2015/10/9 17:08, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote: > On 2015/10/09 14:52, Jiang Liu wrote: >> On 2015/10/9 4:20, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes >>> wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: > Acked-by: Kiran

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On 2015/10/9 4:20, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes > wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: >> >>> Acked-by: Kiran Patil >> >> Where's the call to preempt_disable() to prevent kernels with preemption >> from making numa_node_id()

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: > > > Acked-by: Kiran Patil > > Where's the call to preempt_disable() to prevent kernels with preemption > from making numa_node_id() invalid during this iteration? David asked this

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: > > > Acked-by: Kiran Patil > > Where's the call to preempt_disable() to prevent kernels with preemption > from making numa_node_id() invalid

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On 2015/10/9 4:20, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes > wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: >> >>> Acked-by: Kiran Patil >> >> Where's the call to preempt_disable() to prevent kernels with

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: > Acked-by: Kiran Patil Where's the call to preempt_disable() to prevent kernels with preemption from making numa_node_id() invalid during this iteration? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org; Jiang Liu Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node Function i40e_clean_rx_irq() tries to reuse memory pages allocated from the nearest node. To better support memoryless node, use numa_mem_id() instead

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

...@kvack.org; intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org; Jiang Liu Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node Function i40e_clean_rx_irq() tries to reuse memory pages allocated from the nearest node. To better support memoryless node, use numa_mem_id

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: Acked-by: Kiran Patil kiran.pa...@intel.com Where's the call to preempt_disable() to prevent kernels with preemption from making numa_node_id() invalid during this iteration? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in

Re: [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote: > Function i40e_clean_rx_irq() tries to reuse memory pages allocated s/i40e_clean_rx_irq/i40e_clean_rx_irq_ps/ > from the nearest node. To better support memoryless node, use > numa_mem_id() instead of numa_node_id() to get the nearest node with > memory. >

Re: [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote: Function i40e_clean_rx_irq() tries to reuse memory pages allocated s/i40e_clean_rx_irq/i40e_clean_rx_irq_ps/ from the nearest node. To better support memoryless node, use numa_mem_id() instead of numa_node_id() to get the nearest node with memory.

[Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

Function i40e_clean_rx_irq() tries to reuse memory pages allocated from the nearest node. To better support memoryless node, use numa_mem_id() instead of numa_node_id() to get the nearest node with memory. This change should only affect performance. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu ---

[Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

Function i40e_clean_rx_irq() tries to reuse memory pages allocated from the nearest node. To better support memoryless node, use numa_mem_id() instead of numa_node_id() to get the nearest node with memory. This change should only affect performance. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu