On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 08:26:43PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Oh, I see. Sorry I didn't understand the question. In the case of KVM,
> there's simply no code that runs in interrupt context and needs to use
> virtual addresses.
>
> In fact, there's no code that runs in interrupt context at all.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:17:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 13/08/19 21:14, Bharath Vedartham wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was looking at the function hva_to_pfn_fast(in virt/kvm/kvm_main) which
> > is
> > executed in an atomic context(even in non-atomic context, since
> >
On 13/08/19 21:14, Bharath Vedartham wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was looking at the function hva_to_pfn_fast(in virt/kvm/kvm_main) which is
> executed in an atomic context(even in non-atomic context, since
> hva_to_pfn_fast is much faster than hva_to_pfn_slow).
>
> My question is can this be
Hi all,
I was looking at the function hva_to_pfn_fast(in virt/kvm/kvm_main) which is
executed in an atomic context(even in non-atomic context, since
hva_to_pfn_fast is much faster than hva_to_pfn_slow).
My question is can this be executed in an interrupt context?
The motivation for this
4 matches
Mail list logo