On Wednesday, 13 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
>
> On Mi, 2008-02-13 at 00:23 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Ah, ok. Thanks for testing. :-)
> >
> > Can you please check if the current mainline with the following patch
> > applied
> > works on your box?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
On Mi, 2008-02-13 at 00:23 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Ah, ok. Thanks for testing. :-)
>
> Can you please check if the current mainline with the following patch applied
> works on your box?
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1
On Wednesday, 13 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 23:18 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > Ouch. I think I know what the problem is.
> >
> > On top of this patch, please apply the appended one and retest.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> >
> > ---
> >
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 23:18 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> Ouch. I think I know what the problem is.
>
> On top of this patch, please apply the appended one and retest.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 01:13 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > Since _GTS and _BFS don't seem to be defined in your box's BIOS, please
> > try to apply the appended patch on top of the revert and see if that breaks
> > things
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 01:13 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> Since _GTS and _BFS don't seem to be defined in your box's BIOS, please
> try to apply the appended patch on top of the revert and see if that breaks
> things again.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> ---
>
On Wednesday, 13 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
On Mi, 2008-02-13 at 00:23 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Ah, ok. Thanks for testing. :-)
Can you please check if the current mainline with the following patch
applied
works on your box?
Thanks,
Rafael
---
On Mi, 2008-02-13 at 00:23 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Ah, ok. Thanks for testing. :-)
Can you please check if the current mainline with the following patch applied
works on your box?
Thanks,
Rafael
---
drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
On Wednesday, 13 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 23:18 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
Ouch. I think I know what the problem is.
On top of this patch, please apply the appended one and retest.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 23:18 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
Ouch. I think I know what the problem is.
On top of this patch, please apply the appended one and retest.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index:
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 01:13 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
Since _GTS and _BFS don't seem to be defined in your box's BIOS, please
try to apply the appended patch on top of the revert and see if that breaks
things again.
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 01:13 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
Since _GTS and _BFS don't seem to be defined in your box's BIOS, please
try to apply the appended patch on top of the revert and see if that breaks
things again.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c |
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> On Di, 2008-02-12 at 00:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, this is strange, because one function introduced by this commit
> is
> > referred to by the subsequent commits. Can you send me the patch
> reverting
> > this commit that
On Di, 2008-02-12 at 00:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, this is strange, because one function introduced by this commit
is
> referred to by the subsequent commits. Can you send me the patch
reverting
> this commit that you apply on top of 2.6.25-rc1, please?
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
Here
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> > Can you send me the output of acpidump from your system, please?
>
> I atach the output.
>
> > BTW, does the kernel compile for you after reverting this patch?
> >
> > Rafael
>
> Yes, the kernel still compiles and runs on 2.6.25-rc1
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> > Can you send me the output of acpidump from your system, please?
>
> I atach the output.
>
> > BTW, does the kernel compile for you after reverting this patch?
> >
> > Rafael
>
> Yes, the kernel still compiles and runs on 2.6.25-rc1
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Rafaek J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Can you apply the appended patch on top of the current mainline and tetest?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> >
>
> Sorry, that doesn't fix it.
> But I'm pretty sure it is related
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Rafaek J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Can you apply the appended patch on top of the current mainline and tetest?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> >
>
> Sorry, that doesn't fix it.
> But I'm pretty sure it is related
On Feb 11, 2008 7:56 AM, Mirco Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Rafaek J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Can you apply the appended patch on top of the current mainline and tetest?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> >
>
> Sorry, that doesn't fix it.
> But I'm pretty sure it is
On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Rafaek J. Wysocki wrote:
> Can you apply the appended patch on top of the current mainline and tetest?
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
Sorry, that doesn't fix it.
But I'm pretty sure it is related to that commit. Bisecting went
straight forward to it and reverting it
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Rafaek J. Wysocki wrote:
Can you apply the appended patch on top of the current mainline and tetest?
Thanks,
Rafael
Sorry, that doesn't fix it.
But I'm pretty sure it is related to that
On Feb 11, 2008 7:56 AM, Mirco Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Rafaek J. Wysocki wrote:
Can you apply the appended patch on top of the current mainline and tetest?
Thanks,
Rafael
Sorry, that doesn't fix it.
But I'm pretty sure it is related to that
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
Can you send me the output of acpidump from your system, please?
I atach the output.
BTW, does the kernel compile for you after reverting this patch?
Rafael
Yes, the kernel still compiles and runs on 2.6.25-rc1 with the commit
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
Can you send me the output of acpidump from your system, please?
I atach the output.
BTW, does the kernel compile for you after reverting this patch?
Rafael
Yes, the kernel still compiles and runs on 2.6.25-rc1 with the commit
On Di, 2008-02-12 at 00:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well, this is strange, because one function introduced by this commit
is
referred to by the subsequent commits. Can you send me the patch
reverting
this commit that you apply on top of 2.6.25-rc1, please?
Thanks,
Rafael
Here is
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
On Di, 2008-02-12 at 00:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well, this is strange, because one function introduced by this commit
is
referred to by the subsequent commits. Can you send me the patch
reverting
this commit that you apply
On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2008 9:21 AM, Mirco Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I think I found a regression in 2.6.24-git. After waking up from suspend
> > 2 ram, the fan of my laptop turns constantly at highest speed. It didn't
> > do this in
On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
> I think I found a regression in 2.6.24-git. After waking up from suspend
> 2 ram, the fan of my laptop turns constantly at highest speed. It didn't
> do this in 2.6.24.
>
> I bisected it down to this commit:
>
> commit
On Feb 10, 2008 9:21 AM, Mirco Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think I found a regression in 2.6.24-git. After waking up from suspend
> 2 ram, the fan of my laptop turns constantly at highest speed. It didn't
> do this in 2.6.24.
>
> I bisected it down to this commit:
>
> commit
Hi
I think I found a regression in 2.6.24-git. After waking up from suspend
2 ram, the fan of my laptop turns constantly at highest speed. It didn't
do this in 2.6.24.
I bisected it down to this commit:
commit c95d47a868f35cd47643d116a3c680cdaa954df8
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL
Hi
I think I found a regression in 2.6.24-git. After waking up from suspend
2 ram, the fan of my laptop turns constantly at highest speed. It didn't
do this in 2.6.24.
I bisected it down to this commit:
commit c95d47a868f35cd47643d116a3c680cdaa954df8
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 10, 2008 9:21 AM, Mirco Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I think I found a regression in 2.6.24-git. After waking up from suspend
2 ram, the fan of my laptop turns constantly at highest speed. It didn't
do this in 2.6.24.
I bisected it down to this commit:
commit
On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
Hi
Hi,
I think I found a regression in 2.6.24-git. After waking up from suspend
2 ram, the fan of my laptop turns constantly at highest speed. It didn't
do this in 2.6.24.
I bisected it down to this commit:
commit
On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Ray Lee wrote:
On Feb 10, 2008 9:21 AM, Mirco Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I think I found a regression in 2.6.24-git. After waking up from suspend
2 ram, the fan of my laptop turns constantly at highest speed. It didn't
do this in 2.6.24.
I
34 matches
Mail list logo
