On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 22:20 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> I take it both sides of the virtual device drivers are turned on by
> the lguest option?
Yeah, to quote the code in drivers/lguest/lguest_bus.c:
/* At the moment we build all the drivers into the kernel because they're so
* simple: 8144
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:43:09AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 10:13 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:02 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:43:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 10:13 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:02 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:43:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > http://lguest.ozlabs.org/lguest-2.6.21-254.patch.gz
> > >
> > > See Documentation/lguest/lguest.txt for how
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:02 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:43:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > http://lguest.ozlabs.org/lguest-2.6.21-254.patch.gz
> >
> > See Documentation/lguest/lguest.txt for how to run,
> > drivers/lguest/README for the draft code
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:43:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Lguest is a simple hypervisor which runs Linux under Linux, without
> needing VT hardware.
>
> Two people asked if I had a version of lguest which worked on
> other-than-bleeding-edge-mm kernels, so I did a
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:43:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
Hi all,
Lguest is a simple hypervisor which runs Linux under Linux, without
needing VT hardware.
Two people asked if I had a version of lguest which worked on
other-than-bleeding-edge-mm kernels, so I did a
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:02 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:43:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
http://lguest.ozlabs.org/lguest-2.6.21-254.patch.gz
See Documentation/lguest/lguest.txt for how to run,
drivers/lguest/README for the draft code documentation
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 10:13 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:02 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:43:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
http://lguest.ozlabs.org/lguest-2.6.21-254.patch.gz
See Documentation/lguest/lguest.txt for how to run,
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:43:09AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 10:13 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:02 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:43:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 22:20 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
I take it both sides of the virtual device drivers are turned on by
the lguest option?
Yeah, to quote the code in drivers/lguest/lguest_bus.c:
/* At the moment we build all the drivers into the kernel because they're so
* simple: 8144
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:20:32PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
>On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:57 +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:00:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> >Thanks for the patch. This omission (in several places) was
>> >deliberate. We can't really do anything
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:57 +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:00:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch. This omission (in several places) was
> >deliberate. We can't really do anything sensible if the user unmapped
> >the page. I assume you saw a gcc
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:00:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
>On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:33 +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>> Hi Rusty!
>>
>> I found you forgot to check the return value of copy_from_user, and
>> here is the fix for drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:33 +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> Hi Rusty!
>
> I found you forgot to check the return value of copy_from_user, and
> here is the fix for drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Wang!
Thanks for the patch. This
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:33:03AM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>Hi Rusty!
>
>I found you forgot to check the return value of copy_from_user, and here is
>the fix for drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c.
>
Also this one, in drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Rusty!
I found you forgot to check the return value of copy_from_user, and here is the
fix for drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c.orig
2007-05-03 03:10:44.0
Hi all,
Lguest is a simple hypervisor which runs Linux under Linux, without
needing VT hardware.
Two people asked if I had a version of lguest which worked on
other-than-bleeding-edge-mm kernels, so I did a backport of the latest
version to 2.6.21.
Hi all,
Lguest is a simple hypervisor which runs Linux under Linux, without
needing VT hardware.
Two people asked if I had a version of lguest which worked on
other-than-bleeding-edge-mm kernels, so I did a backport of the latest
version to 2.6.21.
Hi Rusty!
I found you forgot to check the return value of copy_from_user, and here is the
fix for drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c.orig
2007-05-03 03:10:44.0 +0800
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:33:03AM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
Hi Rusty!
I found you forgot to check the return value of copy_from_user, and here is
the fix for drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c.
Also this one, in drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:33 +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
Hi Rusty!
I found you forgot to check the return value of copy_from_user, and
here is the fix for drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Wang!
Thanks for the patch. This omission
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:00:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:33 +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
Hi Rusty!
I found you forgot to check the return value of copy_from_user, and
here is the fix for drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong [EMAIL
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:57 +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:00:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
Thanks for the patch. This omission (in several places) was
deliberate. We can't really do anything sensible if the user unmapped
the page. I assume you saw a gcc warning
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:20:32PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:57 +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:00:48AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
Thanks for the patch. This omission (in several places) was
deliberate. We can't really do anything sensible if
24 matches
Mail list logo