And more importantly please test with a file system that uses the
iomap direct I/O code (btrfs, gfs2, ext4, xfs, zonefs) as we should
never just work aroudn a legacy codebase that should go away in the
block layer.
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:13:01PM +, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > On 2021/04/09 23:47, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > On 4/7/21 3:27 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > >> On 2021/04/07 18:46, Changheun Lee wrote:
> > >>> I'll prepare new patch as you recommand. It will be added setting of
> > >>>
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:13:01PM +, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2021/04/09 23:47, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 4/7/21 3:27 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> >> On 2021/04/07 18:46, Changheun Lee wrote:
> >>> I'll prepare new patch as you recommand. It will be added setting of
> >>> limit_bio_size
On 2021/04/09 23:47, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/7/21 3:27 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 2021/04/07 18:46, Changheun Lee wrote:
>>> I'll prepare new patch as you recommand. It will be added setting of
>>> limit_bio_size automatically when queue max sectors is determined.
>>
>> Please do that
On 4/7/21 3:27 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On 2021/04/07 18:46, Changheun Lee wrote:
I'll prepare new patch as you recommand. It will be added setting of
limit_bio_size automatically when queue max sectors is determined.
Please do that in the driver for the HW that benefits from it. Do not do
On 2021/04/07 18:46, Changheun Lee wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 03:55:07PM +0900, Changheun Lee wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:06:33PM +0900, Changheun Lee wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:16:12AM +0900, Changheun Lee wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:31:28AM +0900,
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 03:55:07PM +0900, Changheun Lee wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:06:33PM +0900, Changheun Lee wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:16:12AM +0900, Changheun Lee wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:31:28AM +0900, Changheun Lee wrote:
> > > > > > >
7 matches
Mail list logo