It's more straightforward to use for statement here.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel....@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensou...@diasemi.com>
---
This was sent on https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/11/208 with Adam's Ack.
 drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c 
b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
index 710e67081d53..9bb895006455 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
@@ -942,8 +942,7 @@ static int da9062_regulator_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
        regulators->n_regulators = max_regulators;
        platform_set_drvdata(pdev, regulators);
 
-       n = 0;
-       while (n < regulators->n_regulators) {
+       for (n = 0; n < regulators->n_regulators; n++) {
                /* Initialise regulator structure */
                regl = &regulators->regulator[n];
                regl->hw = chip;
@@ -1002,8 +1001,6 @@ static int da9062_regulator_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
                                regl->desc.name);
                        return PTR_ERR(regl->rdev);
                }
-
-               n++;
        }
 
        /* LDOs overcurrent event support */
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to