On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:32:10PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> this definitly looks like material for 4.7-rc fixes to me. Could you take a
> look
> and maybe include it?
Applied to my fixes branch, thanks.
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:32:10PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> this definitly looks like material for 4.7-rc fixes to me. Could you take a
> look
> and maybe include it?
Applied to my fixes branch, thanks.
Hi Joerg,
Am Mittwoch, 1. Juni 2016, 16:46:10 schrieb John Keeping:
> rk_iommu_command() takes a struct rk_iommu and iterates over the slave
> MMUs, so this is doubly wrong in that we're passing in the wrong pointer
> and talking to MMUs that we shouldn't be.
>
> Fixes: cd6438c5f844
Hi Joerg,
Am Mittwoch, 1. Juni 2016, 16:46:10 schrieb John Keeping:
> rk_iommu_command() takes a struct rk_iommu and iterates over the slave
> MMUs, so this is doubly wrong in that we're passing in the wrong pointer
> and talking to MMUs that we shouldn't be.
>
> Fixes: cd6438c5f844
rk_iommu_command() takes a struct rk_iommu and iterates over the slave
MMUs, so this is doubly wrong in that we're passing in the wrong pointer
and talking to MMUs that we shouldn't be.
Fixes: cd6438c5f844 ("iommu/rockchip: Reconstruct to support multi slaves")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
rk_iommu_command() takes a struct rk_iommu and iterates over the slave
MMUs, so this is doubly wrong in that we're passing in the wrong pointer
and talking to MMUs that we shouldn't be.
Fixes: cd6438c5f844 ("iommu/rockchip: Reconstruct to support multi slaves")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
6 matches
Mail list logo
