Hi Wang,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test WARNING on linux/master v5.7]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base'
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 10:46:41AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 10:49:25AM +0800, Wang ShaoBo wrote:
> > Currently arm64 personality syscall uses wrapper __arm64_sys_personality
> > to redirect to __arm64_sys_arm64_personality, it's easily confused,
> > Whereas using an
在 2020/6/8 17:46, Catalin Marinas 写道:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 10:49:25AM +0800, Wang ShaoBo wrote:
Currently arm64 personality syscall uses wrapper __arm64_sys_personality
to redirect to __arm64_sys_arm64_personality, it's easily confused,
Whereas using an normal hook arch_check_personality()
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 10:49:25AM +0800, Wang ShaoBo wrote:
> Currently arm64 personality syscall uses wrapper __arm64_sys_personality
> to redirect to __arm64_sys_arm64_personality, it's easily confused,
> Whereas using an normal hook arch_check_personality() can reject
> additional settings
Hi Wang,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.7 next-20200605]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to
Currently arm64 personality syscall uses wrapper __arm64_sys_personality
to redirect to __arm64_sys_arm64_personality, it's easily confused,
Whereas using an normal hook arch_check_personality() can reject
additional settings like this for special case of different architectures.
This makes code
6 matches
Mail list logo