Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-07-15 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:05:25PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:45:42AM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:13:59AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:04:57PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > > > Using a string to

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-07-15 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:45:42AM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:13:59AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:04:57PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > > Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. > > > Some

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-07-15 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:13:59AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:04:57PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. > > Some controllers may need extra information to fully describe a pin. It > > concerns

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-07-15 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:45:42AM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:13:59AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:04:57PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. Some controllers may

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-07-15 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:13:59AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:04:57PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. Some controllers may need extra information to fully describe a pin. It concerns mainly

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-07-15 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:05:25PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:45:42AM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:13:59AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:04:57PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: Using a string to describe a

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-07-14 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:04:57PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. > Some controllers may need extra information to fully describe a pin. It > concerns mainly controllers which have a per pin muxing approach which > don't fit

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-07-14 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:04:57PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. Some controllers may need extra information to fully describe a pin. It concerns mainly controllers which have a per pin muxing approach which don't fit

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-06-17 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:01:29AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/10/2015 09:04 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > >Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. > >Some controllers may need extra information to fully describe a pin. It > >concerns mainly controllers

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-06-17 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:01:29AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: On 06/10/2015 09:04 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote: Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. Some controllers may need extra information to fully describe a pin. It concerns mainly controllers which have

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-06-15 Thread Stephen Warren
On 06/10/2015 09:04 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote: Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. Some controllers may need extra information to fully describe a pin. It concerns mainly controllers which have a per pin muxing approach which don't fit well the notions of

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-06-15 Thread Stephen Warren
On 06/10/2015 09:04 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote: Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. Some controllers may need extra information to fully describe a pin. It concerns mainly controllers which have a per pin muxing approach which don't fit well the notions of

[RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-06-10 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. Some controllers may need extra information to fully describe a pin. It concerns mainly controllers which have a per pin muxing approach which don't fit well the notions of groups and functions. Instead of using a pin name, a

[RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: introduce complex pin description

2015-06-10 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Using a string to describe a pin in the device tree can be not enough. Some controllers may need extra information to fully describe a pin. It concerns mainly controllers which have a per pin muxing approach which don't fit well the notions of groups and functions. Instead of using a pin name, a