On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:45:39PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 16:44 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:08:41PM +0900, gyun...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Gyungoh Yoo
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo
> >
> > This doesn't apply against current
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:41:20AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:45:34PM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:53:29AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > I'm having a hard time understanding why it is difficult to split the
> > > two changes - they are in
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:41:20AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:45:34PM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:53:29AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
I'm having a hard time understanding why it is difficult to split the
two changes - they are in completely
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:45:39PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 16:44 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:08:41PM +0900, gyun...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
This
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:45:34PM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:53:29AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I'm having a hard time understanding why it is difficult to split the
> > two changes - they are in completely separate files.
> I am sorry for the hard time.
> That
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:45:34PM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:53:29AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
I'm having a hard time understanding why it is difficult to split the
two changes - they are in completely separate files.
I am sorry for the hard time.
That was
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:53:29AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:43:34AM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:44:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > This doesn't apply against current code and depends on the MFD symbol
> > > rename - can you please
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:45:39PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 16:44 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > it doesn't seem obviously related to the driver
> > change and should probably be in the same patch as the MFD symbol rename
> > for bisetion.
> I don't think there will be
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:43:34AM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:44:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This doesn't apply against current code and depends on the MFD symbol
> > rename - can you please check what's going on here?
> Are you talking about
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:44:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:08:41PM +0900, gyun...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Gyungoh Yoo
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo
>
> This doesn't apply against current code and depends on the MFD symbol
> rename - can you please check
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 16:44 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:08:41PM +0900, gyun...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Gyungoh Yoo
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo
>
> This doesn't apply against current code and depends on the MFD symbol
> rename - can you please check what's
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 16:44 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:08:41PM +0900, gyun...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
This doesn't apply against current code and depends on the MFD symbol
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:44:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:08:41PM +0900, gyun...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
This doesn't apply against current code and depends on the MFD
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:43:34AM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:44:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
This doesn't apply against current code and depends on the MFD symbol
rename - can you please check what's going on here?
Are you talking about 'sky81452-regulator'?
I
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:45:39PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 16:44 +, Mark Brown wrote:
it doesn't seem obviously related to the driver
change and should probably be in the same patch as the MFD symbol rename
for bisetion.
I don't think there will be bisection
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:53:29AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:43:34AM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:44:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
This doesn't apply against current code and depends on the MFD symbol
rename - can you please check what's
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:08:41PM +0900, gyun...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Gyungoh Yoo
>
> Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo
This doesn't apply against current code and depends on the MFD symbol
rename - can you please check what's going on here?
It would make sense to split the Kconfig symbol
From: Gyungoh Yoo
Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo
---
Changes v6:
Added new line character at the end of line of dev_err()
Changes v5:
Changed DT for regulator : 'lout' node should be defined under 'regulator'
Removed compatible string
Modified to return EINVAL when of_node is NULL
Changes v4:
From: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
---
Changes v6:
Added new line character at the end of line of dev_err()
Changes v5:
Changed DT for regulator : 'lout' node should be defined under 'regulator'
Removed compatible string
Modified to
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:08:41PM +0900, gyun...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
This doesn't apply against current code and depends on the MFD symbol
rename - can you please check what's going on here?
It would
20 matches
Mail list logo
