On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:46:32 +0100
Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso
> > >
> > > to this patch and 4/8.
> >
> > Thanks for this!
> >
> > Can I get someone to ack 3/8?
>
> I don't see any 3/8 in my inbox, only 2/8 and 4/8.
>
> Let me know, thanks.
I replied
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 06:46:19 -0800
Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 09:31 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:22:36 +0100
> > Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:46:32 +0100
Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > Can I get someone to ack 3/8?
>
> I don't see any 3/8 in my inbox, only 2/8 and 4/8.
>
> Let me know, thanks.
Strange, you were on the Cc of that patch.
Let me go back and check to make sure that didn't bounce too.
-- Steve
--
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 09:31 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:22:36 +0100
> Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400 Steven Rostedt
> > > wrote:
> > > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:31:50AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:22:36 +0100
> Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400
> > > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: "Steven
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:22:36 +0100
Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> > >
> > > [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
> >
> > Can any of the
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> >
> > [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
>
> Can any of the netfilter folks give me an Acked-by for this?
If Florian's concern were
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 08:05:35 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> >
> > [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
>
> Can any of the netfilter folks give me an Acked-by for this?
>
I hope nobody expects Jozsef
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>
> [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
Can any of the netfilter folks give me an Acked-by for this?
Thanks!
-- Steve
>
> The seq_printf() and friends are having their return values removed.
> The
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
[ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
Can any of the netfilter folks give me an Acked-by for this?
Thanks!
-- Steve
The seq_printf() and friends are having their return values
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 08:05:35 -0500
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
[ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
Can any of the netfilter folks give me an Acked-by for
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
[ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
Can any of the netfilter folks give me an Acked-by for this?
If
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:22:36 +0100
Pablo Neira Ayuso pa...@netfilter.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
[
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:31:50AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:22:36 +0100
Pablo Neira Ayuso pa...@netfilter.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 09:31 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:22:36 +0100
Pablo Neira Ayuso pa...@netfilter.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:04 -0400 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
wrote:
From:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:46:32 +0100
Pablo Neira Ayuso pa...@netfilter.org wrote:
Can I get someone to ack 3/8?
I don't see any 3/8 in my inbox, only 2/8 and 4/8.
Let me know, thanks.
Strange, you were on the Cc of that patch.
Let me go back and check to make sure that didn't bounce too.
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 06:46:19 -0800
Joe Perches j...@perches.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 09:31 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:22:36 +0100
Pablo Neira Ayuso pa...@netfilter.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:05:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:46:32 +0100
Pablo Neira Ayuso pa...@netfilter.org wrote:
Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso pa...@netfilter.org
to this patch and 4/8.
Thanks for this!
Can I get someone to ack 3/8?
I don't see any 3/8 in my inbox, only 2/8 and 4/8.
Let me know,
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 23:16:01 +0100
Florian Westphal wrote:
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> >
> > [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
> >
> > The seq_printf() and friends are having their return values removed.
> > The print_conntrack() returns the result of seq_printf(),
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 23:16:01 +0100
Florian Westphal wrote:
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> >
> > [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
> >
> > The seq_printf() and friends are having their return values removed.
> > The print_conntrack() returns the result of seq_printf(),
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>
> [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
>
> The seq_printf() and friends are having their return values removed.
> The print_conntrack() returns the result of seq_printf(), which is
> meaningless when seq_printf() returns void. Might as well remove the
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
[ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
The seq_printf() and friends are having their return values removed.
The print_conntrack() returns the result of seq_printf(), which is
meaningless when seq_printf() returns void. Might as well remove the
return values of print_conntrack()
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
[ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
The seq_printf() and friends are having their return values removed.
The print_conntrack() returns the result of seq_printf(), which is
meaningless when seq_printf() returns void. Might as well remove the
return values of
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
[ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
The seq_printf() and friends are having their return values removed.
The print_conntrack() returns the result of seq_printf(), which is
meaningless when seq_printf() returns
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 23:16:01 +0100
Florian Westphal f...@strlen.de wrote:
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
[ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
The seq_printf() and friends are having their return values removed.
The print_conntrack()
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 23:16:01 +0100
Florian Westphal f...@strlen.de wrote:
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
[ REQUEST FOR ACKS ]
The seq_printf() and friends are having their return values removed.
The print_conntrack()
26 matches
Mail list logo
