Re: [RFA][PATCH 5/8] dlm: Remove seq_printf() return checks and use seq_has_overflowed()

2014-11-04 Thread David Teigland
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:08:52AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:07 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > From: Joe Perches > > > > [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ] > > Can any of the DLM maintainers give me an Acked-by for this? Looks ok, Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: [RFA][PATCH 5/8] dlm: Remove seq_printf() return checks and use seq_has_overflowed()

2014-11-04 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:07 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: Joe Perches > > [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ] Can any of the DLM maintainers give me an Acked-by for this? Thanks! -- Steve > > The seq_printf() return is going away soon and users of it should > check seq_has_overflowed() to see if

Re: [RFA][PATCH 5/8] dlm: Remove seq_printf() return checks and use seq_has_overflowed()

2014-11-04 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:07 -0400 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote: From: Joe Perches j...@perches.com [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ] Can any of the DLM maintainers give me an Acked-by for this? Thanks! -- Steve The seq_printf() return is going away soon and users of it should check

Re: [RFA][PATCH 5/8] dlm: Remove seq_printf() return checks and use seq_has_overflowed()

2014-11-04 Thread David Teigland
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:08:52AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:07 -0400 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote: From: Joe Perches j...@perches.com [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ] Can any of the DLM maintainers give me an Acked-by for this? Looks ok, Dave -- To

[RFA][PATCH 5/8] dlm: Remove seq_printf() return checks and use seq_has_overflowed()

2014-10-29 Thread Steven Rostedt
From: Joe Perches [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ] The seq_printf() return is going away soon and users of it should check seq_has_overflowed() to see if the buffer is full and will not accept any more data. Convert functions returning int to void where seq_printf() is used. Link:

[RFA][PATCH 5/8] dlm: Remove seq_printf() return checks and use seq_has_overflowed()

2014-10-29 Thread Steven Rostedt
From: Joe Perches j...@perches.com [ REQUEST FOR ACKS ] The seq_printf() return is going away soon and users of it should check seq_has_overflowed() to see if the buffer is full and will not accept any more data. Convert functions returning int to void where seq_printf() is used. Link: