Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-18 Thread Lukas Wunner
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 01:18:16AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 07:57:31 PM Lukas Wunner wrote: > > To name a different use case: On hybrid graphics laptops, the discrete > > GPU usually includes an HDA controller for external HDMI displays. > > The GPU and the

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-18 Thread Lukas Wunner
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 01:18:16AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 07:57:31 PM Lukas Wunner wrote: > > To name a different use case: On hybrid graphics laptops, the discrete > > GPU usually includes an HDA controller for external HDMI displays. > > The GPU and the

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-18 Thread Lukas Wunner
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:41:33AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:58:56 AM Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Rafael, BTW, didn't you plan to change the name of the device_link_add() > > function to device_dependency_add() to avoid confusion with network device > >

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-18 Thread Lukas Wunner
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:41:33AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:58:56 AM Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Rafael, BTW, didn't you plan to change the name of the device_link_add() > > function to device_dependency_add() to avoid confusion with network device > >

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 07:57:31 PM Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:04:36AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >> As

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 07:57:31 PM Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:04:36AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >> As discussed in the recent

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:58:56 AM Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > > On 2016-09-08 23:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > This is a refresh of the functional dependencies series that I posted last > > year and which has picked up by Marek quite recently. For

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:58:56 AM Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > > On 2016-09-08 23:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > This is a refresh of the functional dependencies series that I posted last > > year and which has picked up by Marek quite recently. For

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-13 Thread Lukas Wunner
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:04:36AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> As discussed in the recent "On-demand device probing" thread and in a > >> Kernel

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-13 Thread Lukas Wunner
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:04:36AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> As discussed in the recent "On-demand device probing" thread and in a > >> Kernel Summit session

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-13 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi Rafael, On 2016-09-08 23:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi Everyone, This is a refresh of the functional dependencies series that I posted last year and which has picked up by Marek quite recently. For reference, appended is my introductory message sent previously (which may be slightly

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-13 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi Rafael, On 2016-09-08 23:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi Everyone, This is a refresh of the functional dependencies series that I posted last year and which has picked up by Marek quite recently. For reference, appended is my introductory message sent previously (which may be slightly

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> As discussed in the recent "On-demand device probing" thread and in a >> Kernel Summit session earlier today, there is a problem with handling >> cases

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> As discussed in the recent "On-demand device probing" thread and in a >> Kernel Summit session earlier today, there is a problem with handling >> cases where functional

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-10 Thread Lukas Wunner
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > As discussed in the recent "On-demand device probing" thread and in a > Kernel Summit session earlier today, there is a problem with handling > cases where functional dependencies between devices are involved. > > What I mean by

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-10 Thread Lukas Wunner
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > As discussed in the recent "On-demand device probing" thread and in a > Kernel Summit session earlier today, there is a problem with handling > cases where functional dependencies between devices are involved. > > What I mean by

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, September 08, 2016 11:25:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a refresh of the functional dependencies series that I posted last > year and which has picked up by Marek quite recently. For reference, appended > is my introductory message sent previously (which

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, September 08, 2016 11:25:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is a refresh of the functional dependencies series that I posted last > year and which has picked up by Marek quite recently. For reference, appended > is my introductory message sent previously (which

[RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Everyone, This is a refresh of the functional dependencies series that I posted last year and which has picked up by Marek quite recently. For reference, appended is my introductory message sent previously (which may be slightly outdated now). As last time, the first patch rearranges the

[RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/7] Functional dependencies between devices

2016-09-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Everyone, This is a refresh of the functional dependencies series that I posted last year and which has picked up by Marek quite recently. For reference, appended is my introductory message sent previously (which may be slightly outdated now). As last time, the first patch rearranges the