Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Ryan Anderson
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:55:00PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hmm, wouldn't it be nice if they put spell checker in GCC? ;) Isn't the resulting beast called "emacs"? -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sunday 06 February 2005 04:27, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt > > is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow > > properly synchronize with the beginning of the packet as mouse is supposed

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sunday 06 February 2005 03:37, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:23:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > Ok, here is the patch using PSMOUSE_CMD_POLL. Seems to work fine with 2 > > external mice that I have and my touchpad in PS/2 compatibility mode. > > > > Unfortunately

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt > is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow > properly synchronize with the beginning of the packet as mouse is supposed > to resend entire package. +* This is second

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:23:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Ok, here is the patch using PSMOUSE_CMD_POLL. Seems to work fine with 2 > external mice that I have and my touchpad in PS/2 compatibility mode. > > Unfortunately POLL command kicks Synaptics out of absolute mode so I > disabled

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:29:20AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Saturday 05 February 2005 16:11, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt > > >

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:29:20AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Saturday 05 February 2005 16:11, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi, The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt is delayed for

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:23:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Ok, here is the patch using PSMOUSE_CMD_POLL. Seems to work fine with 2 external mice that I have and my touchpad in PS/2 compatibility mode. Unfortunately POLL command kicks Synaptics out of absolute mode so I disabled all

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow properly synchronize with the beginning of the packet as mouse is supposed to resend entire package. +* This is second error

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sunday 06 February 2005 03:37, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:23:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Ok, here is the patch using PSMOUSE_CMD_POLL. Seems to work fine with 2 external mice that I have and my touchpad in PS/2 compatibility mode. Unfortunately POLL

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sunday 06 February 2005 04:27, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow properly synchronize with the beginning of the packet as mouse is supposed to

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-06 Thread Ryan Anderson
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:55:00PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hmm, wouldn't it be nice if they put spell checker in GCC? ;) Isn't the resulting beast called emacs? -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sunday 06 February 2005 00:29, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Saturday 05 February 2005 16:11, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt > > > is

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Saturday 05 February 2005 16:11, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt > > is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow > >

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-05 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi, > > The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt > is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow > properly synchronize with the beginning of the packet as mouse is

[RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Hi, The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow properly synchronize with the beginning of the packet as mouse is supposed to resend entire package. Additionally, psmouse will also request

[RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Hi, The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow properly synchronize with the beginning of the packet as mouse is supposed to resend entire package. Additionally, psmouse will also request

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-05 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi, The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow properly synchronize with the beginning of the packet as mouse is supposed

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Saturday 05 February 2005 16:11, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi, The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow properly

Re: [RFC/RFT] Better handling of bad xfers/interrupt delays in psmouse

2005-02-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sunday 06 February 2005 00:29, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Saturday 05 February 2005 16:11, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi, The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt is delayed for more