On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 06:34:35PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> I actually used um as testing ground for this patch so
> it works for um in my way of building um.
Great, thanks.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 22:02:55 +0200
Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the complaints that I continue to hear is that kbuild
> is lacking a way to 'remember' the ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE
> values originally used.
> Likewise we have people that change ARCH settings and get
> a lot of
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 10:09:06AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 12:00:30PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > If it is OK to drop the $(SUBARCH) assingment like this then yes.
> > ARCH?=
> > CROSS_COMPILE ?=
>
> Does the UML build still work when you do
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 12:00:30PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> If it is OK to drop the $(SUBARCH) assingment like this then yes.
> ARCH ?=
> CROSS_COMPILE ?=
Does the UML build still work when you do that?
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 12:00:30PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:39:21AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > -ARCH ?= $(SUBARCH)
> > > -CROSS_COMPILE?=
> >
> > Can you do this in a way that there are still
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:39:21AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > -ARCH ?= $(SUBARCH)
> > -CROSS_COMPILE ?=
>
> Can you do this in a way that there are still these ARCH/CROSS_COMPILE
> lines that are just overriden when empty or
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 08:03:33AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > BTW: I'm currently trying without success to understand why the
> > drivers/infiniband/{hw/amso1100,ulp/srp}/Kbuild files are not
> > named "Makefile".
>
Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> -ARCH ?= $(SUBARCH)
> -CROSS_COMPILE?=
Can you do this in a way that there are still these ARCH/CROSS_COMPILE
lines that are just overriden when empty or have their default value?
This way defaults could be still patched in for
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 06:17:43AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
> > written to the .config?
> Two issues to fix before we can do this:
> 1) chocie values cannot have more than one prompt
what occupying all my time now
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:02:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >...
> > The settings are stored in the build directory in a file
> > named "Kbuild.config" (should it be a .dot file?).
> >...
>
> A .dot file sounds better.
I will make
> > 2) We need to share much more Kconfig* between the individual architectures
> >First step is to let all arch's use drivers/Kconfig
>
> 2) isn't terribly difficult, just takes some time and willingness
> of $arch maintainers to some changes, but please explain a bit more
> why it is
2) We need to share much more Kconfig* between the individual architectures
First step is to let all arch's use drivers/Kconfig
2) isn't terribly difficult, just takes some time and willingness
of $arch maintainers to some changes, but please explain a bit more
why it is needed...?
A
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:02:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
...
The settings are stored in the build directory in a file
named Kbuild.config (should it be a .dot file?).
...
A .dot file sounds better.
I will make it .kbuild.
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 06:17:43AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
written to the .config?
Two issues to fix before we can do this:
1) chocie values cannot have more than one prompt
what occupying all my time now is to try
Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-ARCH ?= $(SUBARCH)
-CROSS_COMPILE?=
Can you do this in a way that there are still these ARCH/CROSS_COMPILE
lines that are just overriden when empty or have their default value?
This way defaults could be still patched in for special
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 08:03:33AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
...
BTW: I'm currently trying without success to understand why the
drivers/infiniband/{hw/amso1100,ulp/srp}/Kbuild files are not
named Makefile.
Giacomo
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:39:21AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-ARCH ?= $(SUBARCH)
-CROSS_COMPILE ?=
Can you do this in a way that there are still these ARCH/CROSS_COMPILE
lines that are just overriden when empty or have their
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 12:00:30PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:39:21AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-ARCH ?= $(SUBARCH)
-CROSS_COMPILE?=
Can you do this in a way that there are still these
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 12:00:30PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
If it is OK to drop the $(SUBARCH) assingment like this then yes.
ARCH ?=
CROSS_COMPILE ?=
Does the UML build still work when you do that?
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 10:09:06AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 12:00:30PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
If it is OK to drop the $(SUBARCH) assingment like this then yes.
ARCH?=
CROSS_COMPILE ?=
Does the UML build still work when you do that?
The
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 22:02:55 +0200
Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the complaints that I continue to hear is that kbuild
is lacking a way to 'remember' the ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE
values originally used.
Likewise we have people that change ARCH settings and get
a lot of build
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 06:34:35PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
I actually used um as testing ground for this patch so
it works for um in my way of building um.
Great, thanks.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:53:16 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 06:17:43 +0200 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > >
> > > What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
> > > written to the .config?
> > Two issues to fix before we can do this:
> > 1) chocie values
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 06:17:43 +0200 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
> > written to the .config?
> Two issues to fix before we can do this:
> 1) chocie values cannot have more than one prompt
> 2) We need to share much more Kconfig*
>
> What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
> written to the .config?
Two issues to fix before we can do this:
1) chocie values cannot have more than one prompt
2) We need to share much more Kconfig* between the individual architectures
First step is to let all
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> BTW: I'm currently trying without success to understand why the
> drivers/infiniband/{hw/amso1100,ulp/srp}/Kbuild files are not
> named "Makefile".
or the inverse ;-) Why all Makefiles (but the top level one ) are not
named Kbuild, considering that they are not
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:02:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>...
> The settings are stored in the build directory in a file
> named "Kbuild.config" (should it be a .dot file?).
>...
A .dot file sounds better.
And even if not, generated files should IMHO not share the Kbuild*
namespace with
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:02:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> One of the complaints that I continue to hear is that kbuild
> is lacking a way to 'remember' the ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE
> values originally used.
Yea, finally.
What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
One of the complaints that I continue to hear is that kbuild
is lacking a way to 'remember' the ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE
values originally used.
Likewise we have people that change ARCH settings and get
a lot of build errors due to asm symlink pointing at the
wrong directory.
This patch tries to
One of the complaints that I continue to hear is that kbuild
is lacking a way to 'remember' the ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE
values originally used.
Likewise we have people that change ARCH settings and get
a lot of build errors due to asm symlink pointing at the
wrong directory.
This patch tries to
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:02:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
One of the complaints that I continue to hear is that kbuild
is lacking a way to 'remember' the ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE
values originally used.
Yea, finally.
What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:02:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
...
The settings are stored in the build directory in a file
named Kbuild.config (should it be a .dot file?).
...
A .dot file sounds better.
And even if not, generated files should IMHO not share the Kbuild*
namespace with
Adrian Bunk wrote:
BTW: I'm currently trying without success to understand why the
drivers/infiniband/{hw/amso1100,ulp/srp}/Kbuild files are not
named Makefile.
or the inverse ;-) Why all Makefiles (but the top level one ) are not
named Kbuild, considering that they are not valid
What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
written to the .config?
Two issues to fix before we can do this:
1) chocie values cannot have more than one prompt
2) We need to share much more Kconfig* between the individual architectures
First step is to let all
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 06:17:43 +0200 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
written to the .config?
Two issues to fix before we can do this:
1) chocie values cannot have more than one prompt
2) We need to share much more Kconfig* between
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:53:16 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 06:17:43 +0200 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
written to the .config?
Two issues to fix before we can do this:
1) chocie values cannot have more
36 matches
Mail list logo
