Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-22 Thread Jeff Garzik
Paul Mackerras wrote: Alan Cox writes: On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:39:45 +0800 David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:52 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. NAK. Not all IDE drivers are converted yet. Not even all the

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-22 Thread Paul Mackerras
Alan Cox writes: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:39:45 +0800 > David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:52 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. > > > > NAK. Not all IDE drivers are converted yet. Not even all the

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-22 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:39:45 +0800 David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:52 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. > > NAK. Not all IDE drivers are converted yet. Not even all the relatively > common ones. All the

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-22 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:52:11 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old > 2007-06-21

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-22 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:52:11 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old 2007-06-21 23:41:03.0

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-22 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:39:45 +0800 David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:52 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. NAK. Not all IDE drivers are converted yet. Not even all the relatively common ones. All the common

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-22 Thread Paul Mackerras
Alan Cox writes: On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:39:45 +0800 David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:52 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. NAK. Not all IDE drivers are converted yet. Not even all the relatively

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-22 Thread Jeff Garzik
Paul Mackerras wrote: Alan Cox writes: On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:39:45 +0800 David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:52 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. NAK. Not all IDE drivers are converted yet. Not even all the

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-21 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 11:39 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:52 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. > > NAK. Not all IDE drivers are converted yet. Not even all the relatively > common ones. Ignore me. I thought you

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-21 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:52 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. NAK. Not all IDE drivers are converted yet. Not even all the relatively common ones. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

[RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old 2007-06-21 23:41:03.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt

[RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old 2007-06-21 23:41:03.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-21 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:52 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. NAK. Not all IDE drivers are converted yet. Not even all the relatively common ones. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal

2007-06-21 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 11:39 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:52 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives. NAK. Not all IDE drivers are converted yet. Not even all the relatively common ones. Ignore me. I thought you were