This is a repost of the patches at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/24/65
The previous post had a misleading subject which ended with a "(".
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
It implements a
This is a repost of the patches at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/24/65
The previous post had a misleading subject which ended with a (.
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
It implements a controller
Hi,
My script could not parse the (#2) and posted the patches as subject
followed by "( " instead
I apologize,
Balbir Singh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
It implements a controller within the containers framework for limiting
memory usage (RSS usage).
The memory controller was discussed at length in the RFC posted to lkml
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
It implements a controller within the containers framework for limiting
memory usage (RSS usage).
The memory controller was discussed at length in the RFC posted to lkml
Hi,
My script could not parse the (#2) and posted the patches as subject
followed by ( instead
I apologize,
Balbir Singh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Magnus Damm wrote:
On 2/19/07, Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Magnus Damm wrote:
> On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches
On 2/19/07, Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Magnus Damm wrote:
> On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7)
>> posted at
>>
Magnus Damm wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7)
posted at
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
>
> It implements a
Paul Menage wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alas, I fear this might have quite bad worst-case behaviour. One small
container which is under constant memory pressure will churn the
system-wide LRUs like mad, and will consume rather a lot of system time.
So it's a
Kirill Korotaev wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alas, I fear this might have quite bad worst-case behaviour. One small
container which is under constant memory pressure will churn the
system-wide LRUs like mad, and will consume rather a lot of system time.
So it's
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
It implements a controller within the containers framework for limiting
memory
On 2/19/07, Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think it's OK for a container to consume lots of system time during
> reclaim, as long as we can account that time to the container involved
> (i.e. if it's done during direct reclaim rather than by something like
> kswapd).
hmm, is it
> On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Alas, I fear this might have quite bad worst-case behaviour. One small
>>container which is under constant memory pressure will churn the
>>system-wide LRUs like mad, and will consume rather a lot of system time.
>>So it's a point at
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
>
> It implements a controller within the
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alas, I fear this might have quite bad worst-case behaviour. One small
container which is under constant memory pressure will churn the
system-wide LRUs like mad, and will consume rather a lot of system time.
So it's a point at which
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
>
> It implements a controller within the containers framework for limiting
> memory usage (RSS
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
It implements a controller within the containers framework for limiting
memory usage (RSS usage).
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alas, I fear this might have quite bad worst-case behaviour. One small
container which is under constant memory pressure will churn the
system-wide LRUs like mad, and will consume rather a lot of system time.
So it's a point at which container
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
It implements a controller within the containers
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alas, I fear this might have quite bad worst-case behaviour. One small
container which is under constant memory pressure will churn the
system-wide LRUs like mad, and will consume rather a lot of system time.
So it's a point at which container
On 2/19/07, Kirill Korotaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's OK for a container to consume lots of system time during
reclaim, as long as we can account that time to the container involved
(i.e. if it's done during direct reclaim rather than by something like
kswapd).
hmm, is it ok to
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
It implements a controller within the containers framework for limiting
memory
Kirill Korotaev wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alas, I fear this might have quite bad worst-case behaviour. One small
container which is under constant memory pressure will churn the
system-wide LRUs like mad, and will consume rather a lot of system time.
So it's a
Paul Menage wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alas, I fear this might have quite bad worst-case behaviour. One small
container which is under constant memory pressure will churn the
system-wide LRUs like mad, and will consume rather a lot of system time.
So it's a
Magnus Damm wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7)
posted at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
It implements a controller
On 2/19/07, Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Magnus Damm wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7)
posted at
Magnus Damm wrote:
On 2/19/07, Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Magnus Damm wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:20:19 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7)
posted at
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
It implements a controller within the containers framework for limiting
memory usage (RSS usage).
The memory controller was discussed at length in the RFC posted to lkml
This patch applies on top of Paul Menage's container patches (V7) posted at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/88
It implements a controller within the containers framework for limiting
memory usage (RSS usage).
The memory controller was discussed at length in the RFC posted to lkml
30 matches
Mail list logo
