Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:17:46PM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: > On 9 February 2016 at 04:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: > >> Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches > >> individually and not in

Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

On 9 February 2016 at 04:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: >> Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches >> individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch. > > Send them in a numbered series so

Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

On 9 February 2016 at 04:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: >> Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches >> individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch. > > Send

Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:17:46PM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: > On 9 February 2016 at 04:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: > >> Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches > >>

Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: > Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches > individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch. Send them in a numbered series so we know what order they have to be applied in. And I always

Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch. Thanks, Amit Pundir On 9 February 2016 at 01:41, Amit Pundir wrote: > From: Badhri Jagan Sridharan > > u_ether driver passes rx data to network layer and

[RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

From: Badhri Jagan Sridharan u_ether driver passes rx data to network layer and resubmits the request back to usb hardware in interrupt context. Network layer processes rx data by scheduling tasklet. For high throughput scenarios on rx data path driver is spending lot of time in interrupt

Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch. Thanks, Amit Pundir On 9 February 2016 at 01:41, Amit Pundir wrote: > From: Badhri Jagan Sridharan > > u_ether

[RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

From: Badhri Jagan Sridharan u_ether driver passes rx data to network layer and resubmits the request back to usb hardware in interrupt context. Network layer processes rx data by scheduling tasklet. For high throughput scenarios on rx data path driver is spending lot of time

Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half handler for rx data path

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: > Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches > individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch. Send them in a numbered series so we know what order they have to be applied in. And I always