On Friday, 24 August 2007 11:02, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > No, I do not think I like that. I believe both -> control and -> crc
> > > > is just useless paranoia. Bitflip in this area is not going to be any
> > > > worse than bitflip anywhere else, we should not pretend this is
> > > > so
Hi!
> > > No, I do not think I like that. I believe both -> control and -> crc
> > > is just useless paranoia. Bitflip in this area is not going to be any
> > > worse than bitflip anywhere else, we should not pretend this is
> > > somehow "more important".
> > >
> > > -> control should really be
On Wednesday, 22 August 2007 18:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 August 2007 10:28, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Since we already pass the address of restore_registers() in the image
> > > header,
> > > we can also p
On Wednesday, 22 August 2007 10:28, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Since we already pass the address of restore_registers() in the image
> > header,
> > we can also pass the value of the CR3 register from before the hibernation
> > in
> > the
Hi!
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Since we already pass the address of restore_registers() in the image header,
> we can also pass the value of the CR3 register from before the hibernation in
> the same way. This will allow us to avoid using init_level4_pgt page tables
> duri
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Since we already pass the address of restore_registers() in the image header,
we can also pass the value of the CR3 register from before the hibernation in
the same way. This will allow us to avoid using init_level4_pgt page tables
during the restore.
6 matches
Mail list logo
