On 5/15/07, Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/15/07, Bharata B Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So there can be two cases in union mounts:
> 1. A file exists in topmost layer and also in one or more lower layers.
Deleting
> the file would result in the top layer file being de
On 5/15/07, Bharata B Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So there can be two cases in union mounts:
1. A file exists in topmost layer and also in one or more lower layers. Deleting
the file would result in the top layer file being deleted and a whiteout being
created in the top layer.
2. A file exi
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:38:46PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On May 14 2007 15:09, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> >
> >Introduce MNT_UNION, MS_UNION and FS_WHT flags. There are the necessary flags
> >for doing
> >
> >mount /dev/hda3 /mnt -o union
> >
> >You need additional patches for util-linu
On May 14 2007 15:09, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>
>Introduce MNT_UNION, MS_UNION and FS_WHT flags. There are the necessary flags
>for doing
>
>mount /dev/hda3 /mnt -o union
>
>You need additional patches for util-linux for that to work.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Signed-off-b
From: Jan Blunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Add a new mount flag (MNT_UNION) for union mount.
Introduce MNT_UNION, MS_UNION and FS_WHT flags. There are the necessary flags
for doing
mount /dev/hda3 /mnt -o union
You need additional patches for util-linux for that to work.
Signed-off-by: J
5 matches
Mail list logo
