Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:45:52PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Ideally, we will eventually have a representation that can map > from regulators all the way down to IP blocks. regulator --> voltage > domain --> power domain --> clock domain --> clocks --> IP block. Well, often the clock bit is

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
Mark Brown writes: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:38:35PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> That being said, I'm not sure why ti,hwmods is being used as an example >> for powerdomains. hwmods describe the integration of SoC IP blocks >> (base addr, IRQ, DMA channel etc., which are being moved to

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:38:35PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > > That being said, I'm not sure why ti,hwmods is being used as an example > > for powerdomains. hwmods describe the integration of SoC IP blocks > > (base addr, IRQ, DMA channel

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:38:35PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > That being said, I'm not sure why ti,hwmods is being used as an example > for powerdomains. hwmods describe the integration of SoC IP blocks > (base addr, IRQ, DMA channel etc., which are being moved to DT) as well > as a bunch of

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > > On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl writes: On Wednesday, July 25, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:38:35PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: That being said, I'm not sure why ti,hwmods is being used as an example for powerdomains. hwmods describe the integration of SoC IP blocks (base addr, IRQ, DMA channel etc., which are being moved to DT) as well as a bunch of SoC

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Mark Brown wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:38:35PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: That being said, I'm not sure why ti,hwmods is being used as an example for powerdomains. hwmods describe the integration of SoC IP blocks (base addr, IRQ, DMA channel etc., which

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com writes: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:38:35PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: That being said, I'm not sure why ti,hwmods is being used as an example for powerdomains. hwmods describe the integration of SoC IP blocks (base addr, IRQ, DMA channel etc.,

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:45:52PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: Ideally, we will eventually have a representation that can map from regulators all the way down to IP blocks. regulator -- voltage domain -- power domain -- clock domain -- clocks -- IP block. Well, often the clock bit is

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-25 Thread Kevin Hilman
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > On Wednesday, July 25, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > > On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > On Saturday 21 July

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-25 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sorry

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J.

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-25 Thread Kevin Hilman
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl writes: On Wednesday, July 25, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Sorry for taking so long to

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-25 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Sorry for taking so long to

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry for taking so long to reply. I am really not that familiar with the

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-24 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Sorry for taking so long to reply. I am really not that familiar with the > > power domain requirements, but I do have two comments

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, July 16, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 05, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, July 04, 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > I guess the OMAP

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-24 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, July 16, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, July 05, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 04, 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > I guess the OMAP hwmod stuff is the closest thing we've got at the > > > >

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-24 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, July 16, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, July 05, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, July 04, 2012, Mark Brown wrote: I guess the OMAP hwmod stuff is the closest thing we've got at the minute (I don't

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, July 16, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, July 05, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, July 04, 2012, Mark Brown wrote: I guess the OMAP hwmod stuff is

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-24 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Sorry for taking so long to reply. I am really not that familiar with the power domain requirements, but I do have two comments on your

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 24 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Saturday 21 July 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Sorry for taking so long to reply. I am really not that familiar with the power

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, July 16, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, July 05, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 04, 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:02:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > I actually don't have any ideas how to do that at the

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, July 16, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, July 05, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, July 04, 2012, Mark Brown wrote: On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:02:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: I actually don't have any ideas how to do that at the moment, but

[RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, July 05, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, July 04, 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:02:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > I actually don't have any ideas how to do that at the moment, but I wonder > > > if anyone has already thought

[RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

2012-07-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, July 05, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, July 04, 2012, Mark Brown wrote: On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:02:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: I actually don't have any ideas how to do that at the moment, but I wonder if anyone has already thought about it?