On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:45:44PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrei Vagin writes:
> >
> > From 8e0f45c0272aa1f789d1657a0acc98c58919dcc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Andrei Vagin
> > Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:57:31 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] mount: skip all mounts from a shared group
Andrei Vagin writes:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:45:44PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> That is certainly interesting. The problem is that the reason we were
>> going slow is that there were in fact mounts that had not been traversed
>> in the share group.
>
> You are right.
>
>>
>> And in
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 02:42:03PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Andrei,
>
> This fixes the issue you have reported and through a refactoring
> makes the code simpler and easier to verify. That said I find your
> last test case very interesting. While looking at it in detail
> I have rea
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:45:44PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrei Vagin writes:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 02:42:03PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>
> >> Andrei,
> >>
> >> This fixes the issue you have reported and through a refactoring
> >> makes the code simpler and easier
Andrei Vagin writes:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 02:42:03PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> Andrei,
>>
>> This fixes the issue you have reported and through a refactoring
>> makes the code simpler and easier to verify. That said I find your
>> last test case very interesting. While looki
Andrei,
This fixes the issue you have reported and through a refactoring
makes the code simpler and easier to verify. That said I find your
last test case very interesting. While looking at it in detail
I have realized I don't fully understand why we have both lookup_mnt and
lookup_mnt_last, s
6 matches
Mail list logo