On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 08:03:16 -0500 (EST), linux-os wrote:
> This must be a joke. Where's the punch line?
It's called a fish in Italian and French.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain
a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty
nor safety."
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 08:03:16 -0500 (EST), linux-os wrote:
This must be a joke. Where's the punch line?
It's called a fish in Italian and French.
--
Giuseppe Oblomov Bilotta
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain
a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty
nor safety. Benjamin
"Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, [iso-8859-1] Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>> linux-os <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> [PATCH snipped]
>>>
>>> Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
>>> Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005 10:16 AM, Richard B. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Renate Meijer wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, linux-os wrote:
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that
On Apr 1, 2005 10:16 AM, Richard B. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Renate Meijer wrote:
>
> >
> > On Apr 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, linux-os wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> [PATCH snipped]
> >>
> >> Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
> >> Those are the ones that
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, [iso-8859-1] Måns Rullgård wrote:
linux-os <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the stuff that
is necessary to earn money.
For now, yes. Hopefully it will change
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Renate Meijer wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, linux-os wrote:
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the stuff that
is necessary to earn money.
Without i386 support, you don't have any
linux-os <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [PATCH snipped]
>
> Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
> Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the stuff that
> is necessary to earn money.
For now, yes. Hopefully it will change some day.
> Without i386 support, you
On Apr 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, linux-os wrote:
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the stuff that
is necessary to earn money.
Without i386 support, you don't have any embedded systems. You
need to use the garbage
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the stuff that
is necessary to earn money.
Without i386 support, you don't have any embedded systems. You
need to use the garbage Motorola CPUs and the proprietary
operating
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Hello, developers.
In order to compete with the new upcoming releases of the
various OSes, and to join all developers efforts into the
one really promising and powerfull direction,
I present you following patch,
which removes absolutely unused in a real
diff -ru ./linux-2.6.9-orig/drivers/scsi/in2000.h
./linux-2.6.9/drivers/scsi/in2000.h
--- ./linux-2.6.9-orig/drivers/scsi/in2000.h2005-03-31 16:26:50.0
+0400
+++ ./linux-2.6.9/drivers/scsi/in2000.h 2005-03-31 17:09:52.0 +0400
@@ -34,11 +34,6 @@
#define DEBUGGING_ON /*
Hello, developers.
In order to compete with the new upcoming releases of the
various OSes, and to join all developers efforts into the
one really promising and powerfull direction,
I present you following patch,
which removes absolutely unused in a real world,
unsupported by vendors and
Hello, developers.
In order to compete with the new upcoming releases of the
various OSes, and to join all developers efforts into the
one really promising and powerfull direction,
I present you following patch,
which removes absolutely unused in a real world,
unsupported by vendors and
diff -ru ./linux-2.6.9-orig/drivers/scsi/in2000.h
./linux-2.6.9/drivers/scsi/in2000.h
--- ./linux-2.6.9-orig/drivers/scsi/in2000.h2005-03-31 16:26:50.0
+0400
+++ ./linux-2.6.9/drivers/scsi/in2000.h 2005-03-31 17:09:52.0 +0400
@@ -34,11 +34,6 @@
#define DEBUGGING_ON /*
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Hello, developers.
In order to compete with the new upcoming releases of the
various OSes, and to join all developers efforts into the
one really promising and powerfull direction,
I present you following patch,
which removes absolutely unused in a real
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the stuff that
is necessary to earn money.
Without i386 support, you don't have any embedded systems. You
need to use the garbage Motorola CPUs and the proprietary
operating
On Apr 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, linux-os wrote:
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the stuff that
is necessary to earn money.
Without i386 support, you don't have any embedded systems. You
need to use the garbage
linux-os [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the stuff that
is necessary to earn money.
For now, yes. Hopefully it will change some day.
Without i386 support, you don't have
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Renate Meijer wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, linux-os wrote:
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the stuff that
is necessary to earn money.
Without i386 support, you don't have any
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, [iso-8859-1] Måns Rullgård wrote:
linux-os [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the stuff that
is necessary to earn money.
For now, yes. Hopefully it will change
On Apr 1, 2005 10:16 AM, Richard B. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Renate Meijer wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, linux-os wrote:
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that run industry, you know,
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005 10:16 AM, Richard B. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Renate Meijer wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, linux-os wrote:
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that
Richard B. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, [iso-8859-1] Måns Rullgård wrote:
linux-os [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[PATCH snipped]
Cruel joke. Now 80 percent of the Intel clones won't boot.
Those are the ones that run industry, you know, the stuff that
is necessary to
24 matches
Mail list logo
