Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-23 Thread Balbir Singh
Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Balbir Singh wrote: >> Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was felt that control_type might not be a good

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-23 Thread Balbir Singh
Hugh Dickins wrote: On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Balbir Singh wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-22 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Balbir Singh wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was > >> felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-22 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Balbir Singh wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right away. We can

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-21 Thread Balbir Singh
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was >> felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right away. >> We can add this flexibility at a later

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was > felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right away. > We can add this flexibility at a later point when required. Gee the

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right away. We can add this flexibility at a later point when required. Gee the memory

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-21 Thread Balbir Singh
Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right away. We can add this flexibility at a later point when

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-20 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was > felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right away. > We can add this flexibility at a later point when required. > >

[RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-20 Thread Balbir Singh
Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right away. We can add this flexibility at a later point when required. Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/linux/memcontrol.h |6 --

[RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-20 Thread Balbir Singh
Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right away. We can add this flexibility at a later point when required. Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/linux/memcontrol.h |6 --

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

2007-12-20 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right away. We can add this flexibility at a later point when required.