Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-25 Thread Matt Porter
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:51:43AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 23 October 2013 08:12 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > >>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-25 Thread Matt Porter
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 09:29:22PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote: > > From: Matt Porter [mailto:matt.por...@linaro.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 7:43 AM > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > > > > On Tue,

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-25 Thread Matt Porter
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 09:29:22PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote: From: Matt Porter [mailto:matt.por...@linaro.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 7:43 AM On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-25 Thread Matt Porter
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:51:43AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi, On Wednesday 23 October 2013 08:12 PM, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-23 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Wednesday 23 October 2013 08:12 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: Hi Kishon, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at

RE: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-23 Thread Paul Zimmerman
> From: Matt Porter [mailto:matt.por...@linaro.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 7:43 AM > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > > >> Hi

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-23 Thread Matt Porter
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:11:15PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:42:42AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200,

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-23 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:42:42AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > > >> Hi Kishon, > > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 21,

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-23 Thread Matt Porter
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > >> Hi Kishon, > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:26PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >>> I think it makes

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-23 Thread Matt Porter
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: Hi Kishon, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:26PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: I think it makes sense to keep

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-23 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:42:42AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: Hi Kishon, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:26PM

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-23 Thread Matt Porter
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:11:15PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: Hi, On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:42:42AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs

RE: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-23 Thread Paul Zimmerman
From: Matt Porter [mailto:matt.por...@linaro.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 7:43 AM On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: Hi Kishon, On

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-23 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Wednesday 23 October 2013 08:12 PM, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:38:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: Hi Kishon, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:26PM +0530,

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-22 Thread Rob Herring
On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: >> Hi Kishon, >> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:26PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> I think it makes sense to keep the data width property in the dwc2 node >>> itself. >>> I

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-22 Thread Matt Porter
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:26PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > I think it makes sense to keep the data width property in the dwc2 node > > itself. > > I mean it describes how the dwc2 IP is

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-22 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi Kishon, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:26PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > I think it makes sense to keep the data width property in the dwc2 node > itself. > I mean it describes how the dwc2 IP is configured in that particular SoC > (given > that it can be either <8> or <16>). If I'm

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-22 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi Kishon, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:26PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: I think it makes sense to keep the data width property in the dwc2 node itself. I mean it describes how the dwc2 IP is configured in that particular SoC (given that it can be either 8 or 16). If I'm reading

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-22 Thread Matt Porter
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: Hi Kishon, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:26PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: I think it makes sense to keep the data width property in the dwc2 node itself. I mean it describes how the dwc2 IP is configured in that

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-22 Thread Rob Herring
On 10/22/2013 06:25 AM, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: Hi Kishon, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:26PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: I think it makes sense to keep the data width property in the dwc2 node itself. I mean it

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-21 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
On Friday 18 October 2013 07:42 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > This is a summary of an unresolved issue resulting from this thread: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg277700.html > > The BCM281xx family of SoCs contain an OTG subsystem consisting of a > DWC2 HSOTG controller and an internal

Re: [RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-21 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
On Friday 18 October 2013 07:42 PM, Matt Porter wrote: This is a summary of an unresolved issue resulting from this thread: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg277700.html The BCM281xx family of SoCs contain an OTG subsystem consisting of a DWC2 HSOTG controller and an internal UTMI

[RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-18 Thread Matt Porter
This is a summary of an unresolved issue resulting from this thread: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg277700.html The BCM281xx family of SoCs contain an OTG subsystem consisting of a DWC2 HSOTG controller and an internal UTMI PHY. This is appears as follows (monospace font requirement

[RFC] Does PHY UTMI data width belong to DWC2 or PHY binding?

2013-10-18 Thread Matt Porter
This is a summary of an unresolved issue resulting from this thread: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg277700.html The BCM281xx family of SoCs contain an OTG subsystem consisting of a DWC2 HSOTG controller and an internal UTMI PHY. This is appears as follows (monospace font requirement