On 11/2/2012 4:38 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, November 02, 2012 04:29:37 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:51:07 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
On Friday, November 02, 2012 02:43:39 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
I've lightly tested this with X and it definitely makes my
su
On Friday, November 02, 2012 04:29:37 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:51:07 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
> > On Friday, November 02, 2012 02:43:39 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > I've lightly tested this with X and it definitely makes my
> > > suspend/resume sequence a bit pr
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:51:07 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> On Friday, November 02, 2012 02:43:39 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > I've lightly tested this with X and it definitely makes my
> > suspend/resume sequence a bit prettier. It should speed things up
> > trivally as well, but most of thos
On Friday, November 02, 2012 02:43:39 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> I've lightly tested this with X and it definitely makes my
> suspend/resume sequence a bit prettier. It should speed things up
> trivally as well, but most of those gains come from other changes to the
> i915 driver (posted earlier to
I've lightly tested this with X and it definitely makes my
suspend/resume sequence a bit prettier. It should speed things up
trivally as well, but most of those gains come from other changes to the
i915 driver (posted earlier to intel-gfx).
Any thoughts? I suspect we'll have to be more defensive
5 matches
Mail list logo