On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:11:37AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> > index 507ddff..29e3f21 100644
> > --- a/fs/read_write.c
> > +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> > @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ Einval:
> >
> > static void wait_on_retry_sync_kiocb(struct kiocb
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 14:40 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I've long hated the non-killability of tasks accessing a dead
> NFS server. Linus had an idea for fixing this way back in 2002:
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.0/0167.html which
> I've prototyped in this patch.
>
>
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 14:40 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
I've long hated the non-killability of tasks accessing a dead
NFS server. Linus had an idea for fixing this way back in 2002:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.0/0167.html which
I've prototyped in this patch.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:11:37AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 507ddff..29e3f21 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ Einval:
static void wait_on_retry_sync_kiocb(struct kiocb *iocb)
{
-
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> I've long hated the non-killability of tasks accessing a dead
> NFS server. Linus had an idea for fixing this way back in 2002:
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.0/0167.html which
> I've prototyped in this patch.
Hey, I
I've long hated the non-killability of tasks accessing a dead
NFS server. Linus had an idea for fixing this way back in 2002:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.0/0167.html which
I've prototyped in this patch.
Splitting up TASK_* into separate bits is going to need a lot more
I've long hated the non-killability of tasks accessing a dead
NFS server. Linus had an idea for fixing this way back in 2002:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.0/0167.html which
I've prototyped in this patch.
Splitting up TASK_* into separate bits is going to need a lot more
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
I've long hated the non-killability of tasks accessing a dead
NFS server. Linus had an idea for fixing this way back in 2002:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.0/0167.html which
I've prototyped in this patch.
Hey, I obviously
8 matches
Mail list logo