Ray wrote:
> bitmap_onto?
Ah - you were the original person to propose this. Thank-you.
> bitmap_read_my_kernel_doc?
;).
> Minor suggestion:
> + * and the n-th bit of @relmap is the m-th set bit of @relmap.
I'll ponder that confusing line - thanks.
--
I won't rest till
David wrote:
> There's also an extra "is" in the description:
ah so so -- thanks.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Kosaki-san wrote:
> I like bitmap_onto
I like it too. And easier to type than bitmap_surjection ;).
> relmap could be sparse (which, btw, would have been nice to
> have in the example)
Good idea.
I'll see what I can cook up.
Thank-you, sir.
--
I won't rest till it's the
Andi, responding to Christoph, wrote:
> You're saying the kernel should use these relative masks internally?
In a conversation with Christoph Thursday afternoon, I got the
impression that he liked the idea of using some more compact
representation of sparse collections of CPUs (or Nodes) than
Andi, responding to Christoph, wrote:
You're saying the kernel should use these relative masks internally?
In a conversation with Christoph Thursday afternoon, I got the
impression that he liked the idea of using some more compact
representation of sparse collections of CPUs (or Nodes) than
Kosaki-san wrote:
I like bitmap_onto
I like it too. And easier to type than bitmap_surjection ;).
relmap could be sparse (which, btw, would have been nice to
have in the example)
Good idea.
I'll see what I can cook up.
Thank-you, sir.
--
I won't rest till it's the best
David wrote:
There's also an extra is in the description:
ah so so -- thanks.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Ray wrote:
bitmap_onto?
Ah - you were the original person to propose this. Thank-you.
bitmap_read_my_kernel_doc?
;).
Minor suggestion:
+ * and the n-th bit of @relmap is the m-th set bit of @relmap.
I'll ponder that confusing line - thanks.
--
I won't rest till it's
Hi Ray,
> > > i prefer another name [!relative].
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > I'll give the name some thought myself.
> > I like good names, and this is the right
> > time to get this one right.
>
> 'Relative map' implies a constant offset. What you have there is just
> a map as relmap
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Ray Lee wrote:
> map_bitmap violates your naming convention, bitmap_map isn't all that
> clear, bitmap_remap is taken, and while it is one-to-one and onto, I
> think calling it bitmap_bijection would lose everyone except the
> mathematicians. bitmap_onto? bitmap_map_onto?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kosaki-san wrote:
> > i prefer another name [!relative].
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> I'll give the name some thought myself.
> I like good names, and this is the right
> time to get this one right.
'Relative map' implies
On Thursday 14 February 2008 21:25:59 Mike Travis wrote:
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> >> You're saying the kernel should use these relative masks internally?
> >
> > There is just some thoughts about this. Did not have time to look into the
> >
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> You're saying the kernel should use these relative masks internally?
>
> There is just some thoughts about this. Did not have time to look into the
> details. Mike?
There are a few places where the entire cpumask is not
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> You're saying the kernel should use these relative masks internally?
There is just some thoughts about this. Did not have time to look into the
details. Mike?
> That means it would be impossible to run workloads that use the complete
> machine because
On Thursday 14 February 2008 20:27:59 Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Excellent. Relative node masks are a nice feature and may allow us to even
> cut down the size of the bitmasks for configurations with large numbers of
> nodes.
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ccing
Excellent. Relative node masks are a nice feature and may allow us to even
cut down the size of the bitmasks for configurations with large numbers of
nodes.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ccing Mike since he may need something similar for cpu masks which are
getting a bit
Kosaki-san wrote:
> i prefer another name [!relative].
Any suggestions?
I'll give the name some thought myself.
I like good names, and this is the right
time to get this one right.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Hi Paul,
> The following adds one more bitmap operator, with the usual
> cpumask and nodemask wrappers. This operator computes one
> bitmap relative to another. If the n-th bit in the origin
> mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask will
> be set, where m is the position of
From: Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Beware - never tested, never booted.]
The following adds one more bitmap operator, with the usual
cpumask and nodemask wrappers. This operator computes one
bitmap relative to another. If the n-th bit in the origin
mask is set, then the m-th bit of the
From: Paul Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Beware - never tested, never booted.]
The following adds one more bitmap operator, with the usual
cpumask and nodemask wrappers. This operator computes one
bitmap relative to another. If the n-th bit in the origin
mask is set, then the m-th bit of the
Hi Paul,
The following adds one more bitmap operator, with the usual
cpumask and nodemask wrappers. This operator computes one
bitmap relative to another. If the n-th bit in the origin
mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask will
be set, where m is the position of the
Kosaki-san wrote:
i prefer another name [!relative].
Any suggestions?
I'll give the name some thought myself.
I like good names, and this is the right
time to get this one right.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Excellent. Relative node masks are a nice feature and may allow us to even
cut down the size of the bitmasks for configurations with large numbers of
nodes.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ccing Mike since he may need something similar for cpu masks which are
getting a bit
On Thursday 14 February 2008 20:27:59 Christoph Lameter wrote:
Excellent. Relative node masks are a nice feature and may allow us to even
cut down the size of the bitmasks for configurations with large numbers of
nodes.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ccing Mike since
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
You're saying the kernel should use these relative masks internally?
There is just some thoughts about this. Did not have time to look into the
details. Mike?
That means it would be impossible to run workloads that use the complete
machine because you
On Thursday 14 February 2008 21:25:59 Mike Travis wrote:
Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
You're saying the kernel should use these relative masks internally?
There is just some thoughts about this. Did not have time to look into the
details. Mike?
Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
You're saying the kernel should use these relative masks internally?
There is just some thoughts about this. Did not have time to look into the
details. Mike?
There are a few places where the entire cpumask is not needed.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Paul Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kosaki-san wrote:
i prefer another name [!relative].
Any suggestions?
I'll give the name some thought myself.
I like good names, and this is the right
time to get this one right.
'Relative map' implies a constant
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Ray Lee wrote:
map_bitmap violates your naming convention, bitmap_map isn't all that
clear, bitmap_remap is taken, and while it is one-to-one and onto, I
think calling it bitmap_bijection would lose everyone except the
mathematicians. bitmap_onto? bitmap_map_onto?
Hi Ray,
i prefer another name [!relative].
Any suggestions?
I'll give the name some thought myself.
I like good names, and this is the right
time to get this one right.
'Relative map' implies a constant offset. What you have there is just
a map as relmap could be sparse
30 matches
Mail list logo
