Hello,
On Wednesday 22 April 2015 15:33:00, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > On Friday 27 March 2015 12:44:03 Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> > > > DMA and the required overhead on very small data blocks seems an
> > > > expensive operation. Due
Hello,
On Wednesday 22 April 2015 15:33:00, Dong Aisheng wrote:
On Friday 27 March 2015 12:44:03 Dong Aisheng wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
DMA and the required overhead on very small data blocks seems an
expensive operation. Due to erratum
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:42:00AM +0200, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 27 March 2015 12:44:03 Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> > > DMA and the required overhead on very small data blocks seems an
> > > expensive operation.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:42:00AM +0200, Juergen Borleis wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 27 March 2015 12:44:03 Dong Aisheng wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
DMA and the required overhead on very small data blocks seems an
expensive operation. Due to
Hi,
On Friday 27 March 2015 12:44:03 Dong Aisheng wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> > DMA and the required overhead on very small data blocks seems an
> > expensive operation. Due to erratum ENGCM07207 for i.MX25 and i.MX35 SoCs
> > the support for
Hi,
On Friday 27 March 2015 12:44:03 Dong Aisheng wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
DMA and the required overhead on very small data blocks seems an
expensive operation. Due to erratum ENGCM07207 for i.MX25 and i.MX35 SoCs
the support for multiblock
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> DMA and the required overhead on very small data blocks seems an expensive
> operation. Due to erratum ENGCM07207 for i.MX25 and i.MX35 SoCs the
> support for multiblock transfers is disabled which results into a huge
> amount of
DMA and the required overhead on very small data blocks seems an expensive
operation. Due to erratum ENGCM07207 for i.MX25 and i.MX35 SoCs the
support for multiblock transfers is disabled which results into a huge
amount of single 512 byte sector transfers and interrupts. This slows down
the
DMA and the required overhead on very small data blocks seems an expensive
operation. Due to erratum ENGCM07207 for i.MX25 and i.MX35 SoCs the
support for multiblock transfers is disabled which results into a huge
amount of single 512 byte sector transfers and interrupts. This slows down
the
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
DMA and the required overhead on very small data blocks seems an expensive
operation. Due to erratum ENGCM07207 for i.MX25 and i.MX35 SoCs the
support for multiblock transfers is disabled which results into a huge
amount of
10 matches
Mail list logo