On 4/9/2021 11:37 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 20:01:14 +0300 Vadym Kochan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:51:13AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 4/9/2021 9:22 AM, Oleksandr Mazur wrote:
I'd like to discuss a possibility of handling devlink port parameters
with devlink
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 20:01:14 +0300 Vadym Kochan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:51:13AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> > On 4/9/2021 9:22 AM, Oleksandr Mazur wrote:
> > > I'd like to discuss a possibility of handling devlink port parameters
> > > with devlink port pointer supplied.
> > >
Hi Sridhar,
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:51:13AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> On 4/9/2021 9:22 AM, Oleksandr Mazur wrote:
> > I'd like to discuss a possibility of handling devlink port parameters
> > with devlink port pointer supplied.
> >
> > Current design makes it impossible to
On 4/9/2021 9:22 AM, Oleksandr Mazur wrote:
I'd like to discuss a possibility of handling devlink port parameters
with devlink port pointer supplied.
Current design makes it impossible to distinguish which port's parameter
should get altered (set) or retrieved (get) whenever there's a single
I'd like to discuss a possibility of handling devlink port parameters
with devlink port pointer supplied.
Current design makes it impossible to distinguish which port's parameter
should get altered (set) or retrieved (get) whenever there's a single
parameter registered within a few ports.
This
5 matches
Mail list logo
