Re: [RFC] selftests: report proper exit statuses

2015-12-28 Thread Shuah Khan
On 12/17/2015 02:26 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Hi Brian, > > On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 11:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:35PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: >>> There are several

Re: [RFC] selftests: report proper exit statuses

2015-12-28 Thread Shuah Khan
On 12/17/2015 02:26 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Hi Brian, > > On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 11:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:35PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: >>> There are several

Re: [RFC] selftests: report proper exit statuses

2015-12-17 Thread Michael Ellerman
Hi Brian, On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 11:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:35PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > > > > > There are several places where we don't report proper exit statuses, and > >

Re: [RFC] selftests: report proper exit statuses

2015-12-17 Thread Michael Ellerman
Hi Brian, On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 11:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:35PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > > > > > There are several places where we don't report proper exit statuses, and > >

Re: [RFC] selftests: report proper exit statuses

2015-12-14 Thread Brian Norris
Hi Michael, On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:35PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > > > There are several places where we don't report proper exit statuses, and > > this can have consequences -- for instance, the gen_kselftest_tar.sh > >

Re: [RFC] selftests: report proper exit statuses

2015-12-14 Thread Brian Norris
Hi Michael, On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:35PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > > > There are several places where we don't report proper exit statuses, and > > this can have consequences -- for instance, the gen_kselftest_tar.sh > >

Re: [RFC] selftests: report proper exit statuses

2015-12-13 Thread Michael Ellerman
Hi Brian, On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > There are several places where we don't report proper exit statuses, and > this can have consequences -- for instance, the gen_kselftest_tar.sh > script might try to produce a tarball for you, even if the 'make' or > 'make

Re: [RFC] selftests: report proper exit statuses

2015-12-13 Thread Michael Ellerman
Hi Brian, On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > There are several places where we don't report proper exit statuses, and > this can have consequences -- for instance, the gen_kselftest_tar.sh > script might try to produce a tarball for you, even if the 'make' or > 'make

[RFC] selftests: report proper exit statuses

2015-12-11 Thread Brian Norris
There are several places where we don't report proper exit statuses, and this can have consequences -- for instance, the gen_kselftest_tar.sh script might try to produce a tarball for you, even if the 'make' or 'make install' steps didn't complete properly. This is only an RFC (and really, it's

[RFC] selftests: report proper exit statuses

2015-12-11 Thread Brian Norris
There are several places where we don't report proper exit statuses, and this can have consequences -- for instance, the gen_kselftest_tar.sh script might try to produce a tarball for you, even if the 'make' or 'make install' steps didn't complete properly. This is only an RFC (and really, it's