On Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:19:59 AM +0200 Trond Myklebust
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Do you really need the parent inode in the filehandle?
>
> That screws rename up pretty badly, since the filehandle changes when
> you rename into a different directory. It means for
Why are people afraid to put Neil Brown's code into 2.4? It works, we have tons
of users using it, it is the only nfs solution that has a tested reiserfs user
base, don't worry that it isn't tested and shouldn't go into 2.4 because it is
better tested than any of these quick fixes that are
Why are people afraid to put Neil Brown's code into 2.4? It works, we have tons
of users using it, it is the only nfs solution that has a tested reiserfs user
base, don't worry that it isn't tested and shouldn't go into 2.4 because it is
better tested than any of these quick fixes that are
On Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:19:59 AM +0200 Trond Myklebust
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chris,
Do you really need the parent inode in the filehandle?
That screws rename up pretty badly, since the filehandle changes when
you rename into a different directory. It means for instance
Hi Chris,
Do you really need the parent inode in the filehandle?
That screws rename up pretty badly, since the filehandle changes when
you rename into a different directory. It means for instance that when
I do
open(foo)
mv foo bar/
write (foo)
close(foo)
then I have a pretty good chance of
> On Monday, April 23, 2001 10:45:14 AM -0400 Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> This patch is not meant to replace Neil Brown's knfsd ops stuff, the
>> goal was to whip up something that had a chance of getting into 2.4.x,
>> and that might be usable by the AFS
On Monday, April 23, 2001 10:45:14 AM -0400 Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
This patch is not meant to replace Neil Brown's knfsd ops stuff, the
goal was to whip up something that had a chance of getting into 2.4.x,
and that might be usable by the AFS guys too. Neil's
Hi Chris,
Do you really need the parent inode in the filehandle?
That screws rename up pretty badly, since the filehandle changes when
you rename into a different directory. It means for instance that when
I do
open(foo)
mv foo bar/
write (foo)
close(foo)
then I have a pretty good chance of
On Monday, April 23, 2001 10:45:14 AM -0400 Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> This patch is not meant to replace Neil Brown's knfsd ops stuff, the
> goal was to whip up something that had a chance of getting into 2.4.x,
> and that might be usable by the AFS guys too.
On Monday, April 23, 2001 10:45:14 AM -0400 Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
This patch is not meant to replace Neil Brown's knfsd ops stuff, the
goal was to whip up something that had a chance of getting into 2.4.x,
and that might be usable by the AFS guys too. Neil's
Hi guys,
This patch is not meant to replace Neil Brown's knfsd ops stuff, the
goal was to whip up something that had a chance of getting into 2.4.x,
and that might be usable by the AFS guys too. Neil's patch tries to
address a bunch of things that I didn't, and looks better for the
long run.
Hi guys,
This patch is not meant to replace Neil Brown's knfsd ops stuff, the
goal was to whip up something that had a chance of getting into 2.4.x,
and that might be usable by the AFS guys too. Neil's patch tries to
address a bunch of things that I didn't, and looks better for the
long run.
12 matches
Mail list logo
