On 12-01-21, 02:02, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:13 AM Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:40 AM Masahiro Yamada
> > wrote:
> We do not need the dtbo-y syntax.
+1
And we are left with much simpler diff with what we agreed on. Does
this look okay now ?
---
.
On 1/5/21 9:21 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here is an attempt to make some changes in the kernel to allow building
>> of device tree overlays.
>>
>> While at it, I would also like to discuss about how we should mention
>> the base
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 4:02 AM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:35 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 12:21 AM Rob Herring wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:24 AM Viresh Kumar
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Here is an attempt
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:13 AM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> +David Gibson
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:40 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 8:17 PM Viresh Kumar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 07-01-21, 14:28, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > Viresh's patch is not enough.
> > > >
>
+David Gibson
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:40 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 8:17 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 07-01-21, 14:28, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > Viresh's patch is not enough.
> > >
> > > We will need to change .gitignore
> > > and scripts/Makefile.dtbinst as
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 8:17 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 07-01-21, 14:28, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Viresh's patch is not enough.
> >
> > We will need to change .gitignore
> > and scripts/Makefile.dtbinst as well.
> >
> > In my understanding, the build rule is completely the same
> > between .d
On 07-01-21, 14:28, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Viresh's patch is not enough.
>
> We will need to change .gitignore
> and scripts/Makefile.dtbinst as well.
>
> In my understanding, the build rule is completely the same
> between .dtb and .dtbo
> As Rob mentioned, I am not sure if we really need/want
Hello,
On 1/7/21 2:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:35 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 12:21 AM Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hello,
Here is an attempt to make some changes in the kernel to allow building
of de
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:35 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 12:21 AM Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Here is an attempt to make some changes in the kernel to allow building
> > > of device tree ove
On 07-01-21, 14:28, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 12:21 AM Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Here is an attempt to make some changes in the kernel to allow building
> > > of device tree overlays.
> > >
>
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 12:21 AM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here is an attempt to make some changes in the kernel to allow building
> > of device tree overlays.
> >
> > While at it, I would also like to discuss about how we shou
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is an attempt to make some changes in the kernel to allow building
> of device tree overlays.
>
> While at it, I would also like to discuss about how we should mention
> the base DT blobs in the Makefiles for the overlays, so t
Hello,
Here is an attempt to make some changes in the kernel to allow building
of device tree overlays.
While at it, I would also like to discuss about how we should mention
the base DT blobs in the Makefiles for the overlays, so they can be
build tested to make sure the overlays apply properly.
13 matches
Mail list logo