Re: [RFC 0/3] kunit vs structleak

2021-01-29 Thread Brendan Higgins
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:15 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:45:25PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > From: Arnd Bergmann > > > > I ran into a couple of problems with kunit tests taking too much stack > > space, sometimes dangerously so. These the the three instances that > >

Re: [RFC 0/3] kunit vs structleak

2021-01-27 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:45:25PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann > > I ran into a couple of problems with kunit tests taking too much stack > space, sometimes dangerously so. These the the three instances that > cause an increase over the warning limit of some architectures:

[RFC 0/3] kunit vs structleak

2021-01-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
From: Arnd Bergmann I ran into a couple of problems with kunit tests taking too much stack space, sometimes dangerously so. These the the three instances that cause an increase over the warning limit of some architectures: lib/bitfield_kunit.c:93:1: error: the frame size of 7440 bytes is larger