On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 11:04:48 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 12/17/20 7:59 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > The basic question I have is whether it makes sense to specialcase the
> > ISM device (can we even find out that we're dealing with an ISM device
> > here?) to force the non-MIO instructions,
On 12/17/20 7:59 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:04:43 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 12/11/20 10:01 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 12/11/20 9:35 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
Let me summarize this to make sure I understand this new region
correctly:
- some devices may have
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:04:43 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 12/11/20 10:01 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> > On 12/11/20 9:35 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> Let me summarize this to make sure I understand this new region
> >> correctly:
> >>
> >> - some devices may have relaxed alignment/length
On 12/11/20 10:01 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 12/11/20 9:35 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:51:23 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 12/10/20 7:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:27:46 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for
On 12/11/20 9:35 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:51:23 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 12/10/20 7:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:27:46 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci passthrough as
QEMU will
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:51:23 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 12/10/20 7:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:27:46 -0500
> > Matthew Rosato wrote:
> >
> >> Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci passthrough as
> >> QEMU will reject the device due to an
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:14:24 +0100
Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On 12/10/20 4:51 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> > On 12/10/20 7:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:27:46 -0500
> >> Matthew Rosato wrote:
> >>
> >>> Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci
On 12/10/20 4:51 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 12/10/20 7:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:27:46 -0500
>> Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>
>>> Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci passthrough as
>>> QEMU will reject the device due to an (inappropriate) MSI-X
On 12/10/20 7:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:27:46 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci passthrough as
QEMU will reject the device due to an (inappropriate) MSI-X check.
However, in an effort to enable ISM device
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:27:46 -0500
Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci passthrough as
> QEMU will reject the device due to an (inappropriate) MSI-X check.
> However, in an effort to enable ISM device passthrough, I realized that the
> manner in which
On 12/9/20 3:27 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci passthrough as
QEMU will reject the device due to an (inappropriate) MSI-X check.
However, in an effort to enable ISM device passthrough, I realized that the
manner in which ISM performs block
Today, ISM devices are completely disallowed for vfio-pci passthrough as
QEMU will reject the device due to an (inappropriate) MSI-X check.
However, in an effort to enable ISM device passthrough, I realized that the
manner in which ISM performs block write operations is highly incompatible
with
12 matches
Mail list logo
