On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
>
>> On May 7, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> @@ -243,15 +237,15 @@ static void flush_tlb_func(void *info)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - if (f->flush_end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL) {
>> + if (f->end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL)
> On May 7, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> @@ -243,15 +237,15 @@ static void flush_tlb_func(void *info)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (f->flush_end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL) {
> + if (f->end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL) {
> local_flush_tlb();
> trace_
Rather than passing all the contents of flush_tlb_info to
flush_tlb_others(), pass a pointer to the structure directly. For
consistency, this also removes the unnecessary cpu parameter from
uv_flush_tlb_others() to make its signature match the other
*flush_tlb_others() functions.
This serves two p
3 matches
Mail list logo