On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 04:37:45PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/27/2014 01:57 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > +struct clk {
> > + struct clk_core clk;
> > +};
>
> I'm confused why that field isn't a pointer instead.
It becomes a pointer in the following patch.
It's been a while since I
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 04:37:45PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/27/2014 01:57 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
+struct clk {
+ struct clk_core clk;
+};
I'm confused why that field isn't a pointer instead.
It becomes a pointer in the following patch.
It's been a while since I created
On 06/27/2014 01:57 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> From: Rabin Vincent
>
> In order to provide per-user accounting, this separates the struct clk
> used in the common clock framework into two structures 'struct clk_core'
> and 'struct clk'. struct clk_core will be used for internal
> manipulation
On 06/27/2014 01:57 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
From: Rabin Vincent rabin.vinc...@stericsson.com
In order to provide per-user accounting, this separates the struct clk
used in the common clock framework into two structures 'struct clk_core'
and 'struct clk'. struct clk_core will be used for
4 matches
Mail list logo
